Suchergebnisse

Hunting legal regulation. Theoretical and practical aspects. Wildlife is public and all humanity distinctive natural inheritance, aesthetical, scientific, cultural and even economical worth. Hunting as the humans preserve and the social institute is miscellaneous expression which includes management of wildlife population (regulation and control), spare – time and work activities. The government has constitutional obligation to guarantee protection of animals living in the wild, protection of their resource and their rational practice. Wherefore the government creates rules in order to ordain the exclusive regulation of using some sort of wild animals which guarantee protection and rational their use. Every year the number of breach of hunting regulation increases. The increasing number of breach of hunting the regulation determinates the relevance of this theme. On the other side the shortage of legal literature about environmental law and administrative responsibility determinates the relevance of this theme too. For the breach of hunting rules in Lithuanian Republic the responsibility is regulated in several legal acts and the man, the breaker, responsible for the breach of hunting rules can be brought to criminal, civil or administrative responsibility. There is the study of administrative responsibility for the breach of hunting rules and the consideration of singularity of such responsibility by theoretical aspects, analysis of practical problems connected to put in practice administrative responsibility. In this theme the attention is laid on the breaches and on the separation of several responsibilities of the breaches of hunting rules. The attention is directed to the purpose of the responsibility and its importance. This study composes of two parts, which are brought into several smaller formations. In the first pat of this study the main point was to traverse legal documents which are important in regulating the hunting, discussing such actual questions as the property right on wild animals, the question of creating hunting areas and other questions of the hunting procedure. In the second part of the study the main theme was analyzed the legal composition of the breach of hunting rules, the problems solving such breaches and the juridical practice on the breakers. In that part there is discussed about perspectives solving the breaches of hunting rules and the juridical practice on the breakers.

Hunting legal regulation. Theoretical and practical aspects. Wildlife is public and all humanity distinctive natural inheritance, aesthetical, scientific, cultural and even economical worth. Hunting as the humans preserve and the social institute is miscellaneous expression which includes management of wildlife population (regulation and control), spare – time and work activities. The government has constitutional obligation to guarantee protection of animals living in the wild, protection of their resource and their rational practice. Wherefore the government creates rules in order to ordain the exclusive regulation of using some sort of wild animals which guarantee protection and rational their use. Every year the number of breach of hunting regulation increases. The increasing number of breach of hunting the regulation determinates the relevance of this theme. On the other side the shortage of legal literature about environmental law and administrative responsibility determinates the relevance of this theme too. For the breach of hunting rules in Lithuanian Republic the responsibility is regulated in several legal acts and the man, the breaker, responsible for the breach of hunting rules can be brought to criminal, civil or administrative responsibility. There is the study of administrative responsibility for the breach of hunting rules and the consideration of singularity of such responsibility by theoretical aspects, analysis of practical problems connected to put in practice administrative responsibility. In this theme the attention is laid on the breaches and on the separation of several responsibilities of the breaches of hunting rules. The attention is directed to the purpose of the responsibility and its importance. This study composes of two parts, which are brought into several smaller formations. In the first pat of this study the main point was to traverse legal documents which are important in regulating the hunting, discussing such actual questions as the property right on wild animals, the question of creating hunting areas and other questions of the hunting procedure. In the second part of the study the main theme was analyzed the legal composition of the breach of hunting rules, the problems solving such breaches and the juridical practice on the breakers. In that part there is discussed about perspectives solving the breaches of hunting rules and the juridical practice on the breakers.