Suchergebnisse

The discrepancy between the introduction of consumer innovations at the modern level of the criminal procedure minimizes the operation of the principle of criminal proceedings. Purpose of the study is to analyze the use of the problems of introducing innovations in criminal proceedings, as well as the development of norms aimed at improving the mechanism for exercising rights during investigative actions using modern technical means. Methodology: the study of the problem of non-use in the preliminary investigation of modern technologies was carried out using formal-logical research methods, analysis of theory and practice, synthesis and the dialectical method. To develop recommendations for improving legislation, in addition to those listed, comparative and statistical methods were used, as well as interviewing. The main results of the work are: a proposal for the creation of official websites of the preliminary investigation bodies. It was recommended to develop remote investigative actions using video conferencing systems in order to comply with the guarantees of the rights of participants in criminal proceedings; to record investigative actions in modern innovative ways, eradicating the institution of attesting witnesses. The creation of a single base on the blockchain principle will help to avoid a huge flow of information.

This paper examines the problem of criminalizing the distortion of historical memory. It largely concerns the Armenian Genocide carried out by the Ottoman Empire in 1915, as well as the events taking place during the Second World War. The work presents judicial practice of national courts and the European Court of Human Rights, which considered the material of such distortion. The authors study the criminal legislation of different countries providing for responsibility for the distortion of historical facts. The paper includes the results of Russian sociological studies on the need to introduce penal prohibitions for historical facts distortion. The findings of this research allowed the authors to conclude that it is advisable to contend with the phenomena under consideration through some social impact measures rather than with criminal legislation methods. Such measures are raising the legal culture of the population, increasing the number of academic hours dedicated to the problematic issues in the courses of history and social studies in educational institutions, organizing new and renovating and promoting existing museums and historical centers (especially such centers as "Khatyn", Auschwitz, Yad Vashem holocaust remembrance center in Israel, the Armenian Genocide Museum in Yerevan and others), providing open access to archive documents for not only scientists, but general public as well - by using modern means of communication.