Suchergebnisse

"Moral rationalism and Sharīʻa is the first attempt at outlining the scope for a theological reading of Sharīʻa, based on a critical examination of why the ʻadliyā theological ethics hasn't significantly impacted Shīʻī readings of Shariʻa and how these resources may come to do so. "--

Abstract"Religious authority" remains a ubiquitous but controversial term of comparative analysis. In Islamic studies, authority is generally personified in the form of the ulama and most often viewed through Weber's lens of charismatic, legal-rational, and traditional types of legitimate domination. Our particular interest, Twelver Shi'i Islam, seems a paradigmatic case, where the relationship between "the Ayatollahs" and state power has dominated academic discussion since Khomeini. Through ethnography of a Shi'i diaspora community in the UK, we argue for a radical shift in perspective: away from forms of clerical power and towards non-specialist uses of clerical authority as expert opinion. Far from such "epistemic" authority being opposed to ordinary agency, here they are inextricably linked. Inspirational work in the anthropology of Islam has understood ordinary Muslim experiences of authority in non-liberal ways, as (Foucauldian) ethical discipline and self-care. We maintain the need to transcend not only domination but discipline too, refocusing the comparison between (Shi'i) Islamic legal and liberal thought, in the form of Raz's classic "service conception" of authority. Both stress the rationality of following authoritative opinion and its role as reason and justification for individual action. Our ethnography of ordinary practice then shows the sheer diversity of ways that such epistemic authority can be taken up, including, but not limited to, projects of personal piety and adversarial community politics. In our context, as surely also in others, domination and discipline should thus be seen as potential uses of "religious" epistemic authority, rather than as its privileged form.

"In Visions of sharīʿa Bhojani, De Rooij and Bohlander present the first broad examination of ways in which legal theory (uṣūl al-fiqh) within Twelver Shi'i thought continues to be a forum for vibrant debates regarding the assumptions, epistemology and hermeneutics of sharīʻa in contemporary Shi'i thought. Bringing together authoritative voices and emerging scholars, from both 'traditional' seminaries and 'Western' academies, the distinct critical insider and emic accounts provided develop a novel avenue in Islamic legal studies. Contextualised through reference to the history of Shi'i legal theory as well as contemporary juristic practice and socio-political considerations, the volume demonstrates how one of the most intellectually vibrant and developed discourses of Islamic thought continues to be a key forum for exploring visions of sharīʿa"--