Distributive Justice and Disability: Utilitarianism Against Egalitarianism
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 621
ISSN: 1541-0986
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 621
ISSN: 1541-0986
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 621-622
ISSN: 1537-5927
In: Canadian public policy: Analyse de politiques, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 131
ISSN: 1911-9917
In: Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities: official journal of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual Disabilities, Band 20, Heft 4, S. 389-393
ISSN: 1741-1130
AbstractThis brief report proposes strategies to support qualitative research with people with intellectual disabilities on topics related to death and dying. We prepared a scoping review on methodological approaches used for qualitative research on death and dying involving participants with intellectual disabilities and a study on perceived barriers and facilitators to accessing end of life settings, conducted with co‐researchers on an online video communication platform. Through conducting these two studies, we found three strategies that we believe will increase the uptake of this research for policymakers, funding bodies and other researchers. The strategies concern research agendas, structured methodological guidance, and allocation of funds. When planning out qualitative research projects about death and dying topics, people with intellectual disabilities must be on the research agendas on topics related to death and dying. To realize this obligation, stakeholders would benefit from structured methodological guidance. The design, planning, and conduct of such studies would benefit greatly from such guidance and would ideally result in the uptake of this type of research. Additionally, proper funding taking into account needed but time‐consuming accommodations for participants is necessary. These strategy options aim to increase the amount of qualitative research that includes people with intellectual disabilities as participants.
In: Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities: JARID, Band 37, Heft 2
ISSN: 1468-3148
AbstractBackgroundPeople with intellectual disabilities are often left out of research on important topics. This exploratory study investigated their views on barriers and facilitators to accessing care at end of life, both at home and in a hospice setting.MethodThis qualitative study used reflexive thematic analysis. Two focus groups were held via Zoom with a total of four participants.ResultsThree themes were produced: Unsettling Transitions, Maintaining Familiarity, and Respecting People's Wishes. Keeping things as unchanged as possible at end of life was highlighted as an ideal. Respecting people's wishes and education were highlighted as facilitators to good end of life care.ConclusionsThe themes identified in this study highlight the fears and wishes of this population with regards to receiving quality end of life care. Training for staff and families, as well as advanced care planning, could focus on enhancing facilitators and decreasing barriers for this population.
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 34, Heft 2, S. 300-306
ISSN: 2154-123X
In: Health services insights, Band 11, S. 117863291879677
ISSN: 1178-6329
In: Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities: JARID, Band 37, Heft 2
ISSN: 1468-3148
AbstractBackgroundA paucity of qualitative research on sensitive topics that focuses on participants with intellectual disabilities leaves their views unexplored. This scoping review mainly aimed to provide an overview of qualitative data collection methods used in research involving participants with intellectual disabilities to explore death and dying.MethodA scoping review of primary research and methodological papers published between January 2008 and March 2022 was conducted. The PRISMA‐ScR checklist was followed.ResultsWe identified 25 articles utilising four data collection methods: interviews, focus groups, the Nominal Group Technique, and participant observation. Data collection trends were identified, including accommodations for participants with intellectual disabilities, visual media used as a facilitator, and reporting of distress protocols. Most participants had mild to moderate intellectual disabilities.ConclusionsThe included studies demonstrate a flexible approach that relies on the use of multiple methods. Future research must adequately report study characteristics to ensure transparency and reliability.
In: The Geneva papers on risk and insurance - issues and practice, Band 28, Heft 2, S. 294-303
ISSN: 1468-0440
In: Disability & society, Band 29, Heft 7, S. 1104-1116
ISSN: 1360-0508