Suchergebnisse

AbstractIntroduction: Multi‐disease community health campaigns can be effective for population‐wide HIV testing in a research setting (SEARCH: NCT01864603). We sought to evaluate feasibility and uptake of a community‐led health campaign (CLHC) planned and implemented by village leaders and local clinic workers in Uganda.Methods: Over five months in 2014, locally elected village leaders and Ministry of Health (MoH) clinic staff in a rural parish in Uganda planned a census followed by a CLHC, after training by two SEARCH trial consultants and by leaders from a neighbouring parish that had previously participated in a SEARCH health campaign. We defined feasibility as: (1) elected leaders' participation in training and implementation of pre‐campaign census and mobilization activities; (2) implementation of all campaign activities by MoH‐funded, local clinic staff; and (3) community participation in the campaign, including point‐of‐care screening for HIV, malaria, hypertension and diabetes, and same‐day referral for male circumcision and family planning (FP). Costing of all salaries and supplies was conducted.Results: Elected leaders from all eight villages in the parish participated in CLHC training. They and local clinic staff met monthly to select and plan CLHC services. Village leaders then leveraged existing volunteer health teams to perform a door‐to‐door census, enumerating 5,202 parish residents over 2 weeks. 2,753 (53%) residents participated in the 6‐day CLHC. Of 1,584 adult participants, 1,474 (93%) tested for HIV: 105/1,474 (7.1%) tested HIV positive. 27% (751/2,753) of participants reported fever and underwent malaria rapid diagnostic testing: 5.3% (40/751) tested positive. Among adults screened, 19% (271/1,452) were hypertensive, and 3% (18/637) had a random blood sugar >11.1 mmol/L. Of 805 men and boys (>10 years), 91 (11%) accepted same‐day clinic referral and underwent medical circumcision. Of 900 women offered same‐day long‐term FP referrals, 25 accepted. The CLHC cost, including census, mobilization and testing services, was $23,597 ($8.57/participant).Conclusions: Elected village leaders successfully planned and conducted a 6‐day multi‐disease health campaign with service provision by local clinic staff that reached over half of a rural Ugandan community. These data suggest it is feasible for local leaders and clinics to adopt a multi‐disease health campaign approach to scale‐up HIV testing in rural Africa.

AbstractIntroductionOptimizing HIV prevention may require structured approaches for providing client‐centred choices as well as community‐based entry points and delivery. We evaluated the effect of a dynamic choice model for HIV prevention, delivered by community health workers (CHWs) with clinician support, on the use of biomedical prevention among persons at risk of HIV in rural East Africa.MethodsWe conducted a cluster randomized trial among persons (≥15 years) with current or anticipated HIV risk in 16 villages in Uganda and Kenya (SEARCH; NCT04810650). The intervention was a client‐centred HIV prevention model, including (1) structured client choice of product (pre‐exposure prophylaxis [PrEP] or post‐exposure prophylaxis [PEP]), service location (clinic or out‐of‐clinic) and HIV testing modality (self‐test or rapid test), with the ability to switch over time; (2) a structured assessment of patient barriers and development of a personalized support plan; and (3) phone access to a clinician 24/7. The intervention was delivered by CHWs and supported by clinicians who oversaw PrEP and PEP initiation and monitoring. Participants in control villages were referred to local health facilities for HIV prevention services, delivered by Ministry of Health staff. The primary outcome was biomedical prevention coverage: a proportion of 48‐week follow‐up with self‐reported PrEP or PEP use.ResultsFrom May to July 2021, we enrolled 429 people (212 intervention; 217 control): 57% women and 35% aged 15–24 years. Among intervention participants, 58% chose PrEP and 58% chose PEP at least once over follow‐up; self‐testing increased from 52% (baseline) to 71% (week 48); ≥98% chose out‐of‐facility service delivery. Among 413 (96%) participants with the primary outcome ascertained, average biomedical prevention coverage was 28.0% in the intervention versus 0.5% in the control: a difference of 27.5% (95% CI: 23.0–31.9%, p<0.001). Impact was larger during periods of self‐reported HIV risk: 36.6% coverage in intervention versus 0.9% in control, a difference of 35.7% (95% CI: 27.5–43.9, p<0.001). Intervention effects were seen across subgroups defined by sex, age group and alcohol use.ConclusionsA client‐centred dynamic choice HIV prevention intervention, including the option to switch between products and CHW‐based delivery in the community, increased biomedical prevention coverage by 27.5%. However, substantial person‐time at risk of HIV remained uncovered.