Tyranny of the minority: the subconstituency politics theory of representation
Why do special interests defeat the people's will in American politics?
61 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Why do special interests defeat the people's will in American politics?
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 25, Heft 3, S. 475-476
ISSN: 1460-3683
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 115-117
ISSN: 1460-3683
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 115-117
ISSN: 1354-0688
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 115-117
ISSN: 1460-3683
In: The Forum: a journal of applied research in contemporary politics, Band 7, Heft 2
ISSN: 1540-8884
In: Journal of political ideologies, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 309-334
ISSN: 1469-9613
In: Journal of political ideologies, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 309-334
ISSN: 1356-9317
In: Polity, Band 36, Heft 4, S. 619-635
ISSN: 1744-1684
In: American review of politics, Band 25, S. 201-220
ISSN: 1051-5054
Are measures of legislator ideology derived from behavior accurate & valid? Past research says yes. However, the benchmarks used to reach these conclusions are often also based on legislators' public actions. Non-ideological factors that cause legislators to take specific issue positions may be highly related across measures & mistakenly lead scholars to believe that action-based estimates are valid. This question is important because scholars frequently wish to use action-based ideology estimates as explanatory variables. Without independent validation, it is unclear whether the results of these studies are valid or the product of measurement error. Applying an ideological benchmark that is not based on legislators' actions, I evaluate the validity of several commonly used ideology measures. The results show that action-based ideology measures produce valid estimates of legislator ideology. 3 Tables, 1 Figure, 2 Appendixes, 74 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: Polity: the journal of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Band 36, Heft 4, S. 619-636
ISSN: 0032-3497
In: American politics research, Band 31, Heft 4, S. 404-425
ISSN: 1552-3373
Measures of political ideology are central to a broad range of political science scholarship. However, despite extensive evaluation of the relative characteristics of vote-based ideology measures, little scholarship examines their validity independent of legislator behavior. Ideological validity is overlooked because all existing measures are action based. To address this gap, this article applies an instrumental-variables technique called FILTER to assess the validity of two important measures of legislator ideology: NOMINATE and interest-group ratings. The technique is also applied to investigate whether the measured action-based ideology suffers from agenda bias. The results show that the measures produce valid estimates of legislator ideology. Moreover, FILTER offers an important alternative to existing action-based measures of ideology that might be inappropriate for use in some settings, such as when the dependent variable being studied is also action based.
In: American politics research, Band 31, Heft 4, S. 404-425
ISSN: 1532-673X
In: Legislative studies quarterly, Band 25, Heft 3, S. 389
ISSN: 1939-9162