Suchergebnisse

Quite a number of researchers have addressed the topic of the instruments of inancial support for economic entities. In their works they use various approaches to the classiication of such instruments. The most common is their division into two groups: instruments of direct and indirect support. In this article, two tools for stimulating the economic activity of economic entities are considered: a direct support instrument – preferential repayable inancing (credit) and an indirect support instrument – an investment tax credit, in terms of their application to stimulate applied scientiic research. The authors give examples of the application of preferential repayable inancing in other sectors of economy, for example, in agriculture and education. Considerable attention is paid to the analysis of legal acts regulating the use of preferential repayable inancing (credit) and an investment tax credit in practice. At present, none of the instruments for stimulating the activities of economic entities is applied in carrying out research and development. The authors investigate the causes of the situation and suggest possible solutions. Based on the analysis of legislative norms, the authors conclude that these tools can be used to stimulate applied scientiic research. The choice of the topic is caused by the fact that the expansion of the range of instruments for supporting applied research can have а positive impact on transforming new knowledge into new technologies and goods, which is of high importance and requires close attention from the government. The application of these tools, both direct and indirect support, in carrying out applied research in the future can improve the conditions for the development and implementation of innovations. ; For citation: SERGEEVA, O. L., BLAGOVESHCHENSKAYA, A. S. (2018) On prospective instruments for inancial support of economic entities in carrying out applied research. Science. Innovations. Education. No. 3 (29). Pp. 5-22.

The pandemic is a watershed event that has prompted both an evaluation of the achievements of information and communications technology (ICT) and also a re-evaluation of the prospects for developing social processes compatible with ICT. Much has been already been accomplished in Russia and throughout the world. But in the current pandemic, telemedicine is facing new challenges. This article discusses the state of the art in telemedicine and the prospects for its development in the changing conditions wrought by the pandemic. Examples are provided of the solutions that telemedicine can offer in such a difficult period, and the risks due to widespread use of telemedicine are analyzed. The impact of telemedicine is extensive with consequences for technology, management, and law. This article is a multidisciplinary study of telemedicine from the perspective of management and law. The article examines how telemedicine technologies have been implemented and developed, the obstacles to telemedicine's advance in various countries, and the legislative frameworks that governs it. The article's interdisciplinary study is based on an integrated methodology which combines: a formal logical approach to analysis of the legislation concerning telemedicine; a comparison of the development of telemedicine across several countries; and a sociological method to identify the attitude of Russian medical staff toward telemedicine and its impact. Although telemedicine has been developed and regulated separately by each country, there are general development trends, such as collection and analysis of electronic health records (EHR), devices and systems to simplify communication between doctors and with chronically ill patients, and others. Legislation is one of the significant barriers to the development of telemedicine in different countries. However, the pandemic has been a catalyst for legislative change, and it is precisely those changes that will eliminate the key problem in telemedicine that beset Russia where telemedicine now resembles separate pieces in a puzzle.

Purpose: The article deals with the politics of the Kemalists in the Republic of Turkey in the 1920s - 1930s, as well as the ways of indoctrination of the main political principles of this ideology. During this period, Turkey, under the leadership of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, began radical changes affecting all spheres of society. Methodology: The research given is based on the principles of science, historicism, and impartiality; moreover, historical-genetic, historical-comparative, historical-systematic methods of historical research are used. Result: Having declared itself a secular state, focusing on the European level of development of those times, the Republican Turkey at the same time created its own system of national education, culture, language, ideology. This was facilitated by quite radical, largely authoritarian transformations. However, it is worth noting that the goal of the reforms was not widespread westernization of society, but the creation of a national Turkish state. Applications: This research can be used for the universities, teachers, and students. Novelty/Originality: In this research, the model of Cinematography as an element of the ideological system of Kemalism is presented in a comprehensive and complete manner.