Fair Value Accounting: Zweckmäßigkeitsanalyse und konzeptioneller Rahmen
In: Gabler Edition Wissenschaft
In: Schriften zum Steuer-, Rechnungs- und Prüfungswesen
37 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Gabler Edition Wissenschaft
In: Schriften zum Steuer-, Rechnungs- und Prüfungswesen
In: Arqus-Diskussionsbeiträge zur quantitativen Steuerlehre 14
In: Chancengleichheit durch Personalpolitik, S. 377-388
In: Deutsches Steuerrecht: DStR ; Wochenschrift & umfassende Datenbank für Steuerberater ; Steuerrecht, Wirtschaftsrecht, Betriebswirtschaft, Beruf ; Organ der Bundessteuerberaterkammer, Band 38, Heft 38, S. 1581-1586
ISSN: 0949-7676, 0012-1347
In: Chancengleichheit durch Personalpolitik, S. 305-316
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
Using a theoretical model for risky investment decisions, we study the effect of interest deductibility restrictions on the choice of organizational form. We analyze the two most widely used approaches: first, rules that limit the interest deductibility if the firm's leverage exceeds a specific level, and second, rules that restrict the interest deduction if the interest expenses exceed a specific percentage of the firm's earnings. Although these restrictions apply uniformly for partnerships and corporations in many countries, we find that they usually distort the choice of organizational form. We demonstrate that only leverage-based interest deductibility restrictions can in theory be modified to achieve organizational form neutrality. However, this requires a legal form dependent application or absence of dividend taxation and in any case a full loss offset which is in contrast to current law in many countries. If one considers corporate loss offset limitations, both types of interest deductibility restrictions always distort the choice of organizational form. Thus, the introduction of interest deductibility restrictions is actually in conflict with the legislators' often declared aim to design tax systems that are neutral with respect to the choice of organizational form.
BASE
Using a theoretical model for risky investment decisions, we study the effect of interest deductibility restrictions on the choice of organizational form. We analyze the two most widely used approaches: first, rules that limit the interest deductibility if the firm's leverage exceeds a specific level, and second, rules that restrict the interest deduction if the interest expenses exceed a specific percentage of the firm's earnings. Although these restrictions apply uniformly for partnerships and corporations in many countries, we find that they usually distort the choice of organizational form. We demonstrate that only leverage-based interest deductibility restrictions can in theory be modified to achieve organizational form neutrality. However, this requires a legal form dependent application or absence of dividend taxation and in any case a full loss offset which is in contrast to current law in many countries. If one considers corporate loss offset limitations, both types of interest deductibility restrictions always distort the choice of organizational form. Thus, the introduction of interest deductibility restrictions is actually in conflict with the legislators' often declared aim to design tax systems that are neutral with respect to the choice of organizational form.
BASE
Eine zusätzliche Einnahmequelle für Professoren und Mitarbeiter von Hochschulen aber auch für Fachkräfte aus Wirtschaft und Politik ist die Durchführung von Lehrveranstaltungen für private oder öffentliche Auftraggeber neben der Hauptbeschäftigung. Vielen Dozenten scheint die sich daraus ergebende Rentenversicherungspflicht unbekannt zu sein. Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es daher, die steuerliche und sozialversicherungsrechtliche Behandlung von Einnahmen aus selbständigen Nebentätigkeiten als Dozent sowie die Folgen einer unterlassenen Abgabenabführung darzustellen.
BASE
In: Deutsches Steuerrecht: DStR ; Wochenschrift & umfassende Datenbank für Steuerberater ; Steuerrecht, Wirtschaftsrecht, Betriebswirtschaft, Beruf ; Organ der Bundessteuerberaterkammer, Band 49, Heft 48, S. 2269-2276
ISSN: 0949-7676, 0012-1347
In: JEBO-D-23-00253
SSRN
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN