Suchergebnisse

Forsyth County, North Carolina has one of the lowest rates of upward economic mobility in the entire United States. Researchers find that one of strongest correlates of upward mobility is the quality of schools in the local system. Using 2018 and 2017 NC Public School Report Card (SRC) data for Forsyth County elementary schools, I find that the percentage of experienced teachers at a school is a significant predictor of school performance. At high-performing schools, a much larger share of their faculties consist of highly experienced and educated teachers, compared to low-performing schools that predominately serve economically disadvantaged children. Experienced and high-quality teachers can have significant long-term impacts on elementary school children, especially those who come from underprivileged families. Yet in Forsyth County, schools with greater shares of economically disadvantaged children have lower percentages of teachers with these characteristics. I argue that the Forsyth County school system can assist in reversing low mobility rates by allocating more experienced teachers toward low-performing elementary schools that serve mostly disadvantaged children. This will insure that these schools have higher experienced-to-inexperienced teacher ratios, while also helping to reduce teacher turnover.

In North Carolina, the Forsyth County Homeownership Program (FCHP) seeks to promote improved socioeconomic outcomes and wealth accumulation through home ownership by subsidizing down payments and offering a targeted financial literacy program. An important aspect of the FCHP is that it allows participants to decide what house to buy and where they ultimately live. We offer a first-ever analysis of the neighborhood differences between where participating families rented and where they moved. Analyzing a sample of 452 participants, we find evidence that the average family moved to neighborhoods with improved socioeconomic characteristics, compared to the neighborhoods where they rented. However, their new neighborhoods had worse socioeconomic measurements when compared to the overall county. We offer a discussion of these results and their policy implications.