Suchergebnisse

Part I: Introduction -- Chapter 1. Introduction -- Part II: What is evictionism? The background -- Chapter 2. What is evictionism? -- Part III: Response to libertarian critiques of evictionism -- Chapter 3. Responses to three leading libertarians: Rothbard, Paul and Rand -- Chapter 4. Rejoinder to Doris Gordon on abortion -- Chapter 5. Response to Friedman on Narveson on abortion -- Chapter 6. Comment on Narveson on Friedman on abortion -- Part IV: Response to non-libertarian critiques of evictionism -- Chapter 7. Rejoinder to Boonin on abortion -- Chapter 8. A Response to Beckwith's book review of Boonin -- Chapter 9. Deadlocked; a reaction to McDonagh and Ford on abortion -- Chapter 10. Response to Lee's "A Christian Philosopher's View of Recent Directions in the Abortion Debate." -- Chapter 11. Marquis on abortion -- Chapter 12. Tooley on abortion: a rejoinder.

Introduction -- Part I. Politics -- Chapter 1. The Federalist -- Chapter 2. The Anarchist -- Chapter 3. The Election Purchaser -- Part II. Free speech -- Chapter 4. The Flag Burner -- Chapter 5. The Demagogue -- Chapter 6. The Yellow Journalist -- Chapter 7. The Blasphemer -- Chapter 8. The Hater -- Part III. Discrimination -- Chapter 9. The Obese Disparager -- Chapter 10. The Pay Gapper -- Chapter 11. The Beard Belittler -- Chapter 12. The Diversity Demeanor -- Part IV. Labor -- Chapter 13. The Wage Stagnationist -- Chapter 14. The Gigster -- Chapter 15. The (voluntary!) Slave Owner -- Chapter 16. The Labor Union Opponent -- Chapter 17. The Precarious Labor Employer -- Chapter 18. The Housewife Non-Payer -- Chapter 19. The Minimum Wage Challenger -- Chapter 20. The Academic Tenure Denier -- Chapter 21. The Work Sharer -- Chapter 22. The Jury Refuser -- Part V. Sex -- Chapter 23. The Group Marriage Participant -- Chapter 24. The Straight White Male -- 25. Jessica Yaniv -- 26. The Adulterer -- Chapter 27. The Front Lawn Nudist -- Chapter 28. The Host Mother -- 29. The Rape Forgiver -- Part VI. Medical -- Chapter 30. The Evictionist -- Chapter 31. The Gay Conversion Therapist -- Chapter 32. The Drug Price Raiser -- Chapter 33. The Non-licensed Doctor -- Chapter 34. The Suicide Instigator -- Chapter 35. The Prescription Drug Violator -- Chapter 36. The Socialized Medicine Debaser -- Chapter 37. The Ambulance Chaser -- Chapter 38. The Food and Drug Administration Challenger -- Chapter 39. The Gene Editor -- Part VII. Real estate -- Chapter 40. The Redliner -- Chapter 41. The Airbnber -- Chapter 42. The Gentrifier -- Chapter 43. The Holdout -- Chapter 44. The Evicter -- Chapter 45. The Rent Control Adversary -- Chapter 46. The Pet Hating Landlord -- Chapter 47. The Zoning Renouncer -- Chapter 48. The Housing Rights Repudiator -- Part VIII. Business -- Chapter 49. The Metric Protester -- Chapter 50. The Cultural Appropriator -- Chapter 51. The Entrepreneur -- Chapter 52. The Self-dealer -- Chapter 53. The Religious Broadcaster -- Chapter 54. The Motor Vehicle Department Derider -- Chapter 55. The Sunday Shopper -- Chapter 56. The Business License Rejecter -- Chapter 57. The Banker -- Part IX. Sports -- Chapter 58. The Booster -- Chapter 59. The NBA-NFL-MLB Eliminator -- Chapter 60. The Olympic Drug Taker -- Chapter 61. The Olympic Commercializer -- Part X. Finance -- Chapter 62. The Billionaire -- Chapter 63. The Bankrupt -- Chapter 64. The Predatory Lender -- Chapter 65. The Anti-Egalitarian -- Chapter 66. The End the Fed Supporter -- Part XI. International -- Chapter 67. The Water Seller -- Chapter 68. The Illegal Immigrant -- Chapter 69. The Free Trader -- Chapter 70. The Car Warrior -- Chapter 71. The Foreign Aid Denigrator -- Chapter 72. The Dumper.

AbstractEconomics is beautiful, and all undergraduates who love and revere beauty should major in this dismal science. Beauty is defined, for present purposes as cooperation, coordination, teamwork, togetherness, inclusiveness, and assists in sports. The greater the number of people participating in the "team," the more gorgeous is the cooperation. The less central direction, whether implicit or explicit, other things equal, the greater is the loveliness of the coordination. The economy, that which economists study, beats all the competition, as, at least ideally, it encompasses the most people on the "team" (all of us!) with the least outside direction. Well, none at all, given full free enterprise with no central planning whatsoever. That, at least, would be the extreme degree of economic freedom.

Abstract
The defense argument in favor of abortion sees the fetus as an invader, a trespasser, someone against whom violence is justified, since this very young person (the fetus) has initiated violence against his mother. Hewitt [30] rejects this argument. The present paper maintains the justification of this defense argument. My perspective is based on the private property rights of the mother. She owns her person. It is as if her body is her house, and a trespasser has invaded it. Surely, she has the right to evict such a person. This analogy is relatively easy to see in the case of rape. The unwanted fetus, now occupying a part of her body is in effect a intruder. If she really owns her body, which I contend she certainly does, she has a right to expel this person from her property. I also argue that voluntary sexual intercourse does not constitution an "invitation" for the pre-born baby to occupy her premises for nine months.

Abstract
Dominiak (2022) takes the position that, according to the libertarian philosophy, there should be no such thing as unjust enrichment. If there is, the beneficiary should be legally obligated to jettison his gains in favor of the benefactor. The present paper takes issue with that stance; it maintains that while there is indeed, of course, unjust enrichment, and in many cases the beneficiary must indeed give up his benefits, there are also counter examples in which this is not indicated.

Abstract
In this paper, the conception of Anthony J. Cesario about the philosophy of animal rights is critically reviewed. His approach is a valiant effort to defend the philosophy of animal rights. He is a moderate on this matter, offering all sorts of compromises. He applies an unusual insight to this matter with using the libertarian doctrine of evictionism.

Abstract
Libertarian punishment theory was initially articulated by Murray N. Rothbard and Walter E. Block. It was broken down into four separate stages. To a great degree, this theory was accepted by Eduardo Blasco and Davie Marcos. However, they maintain it is in need of some slight adjustments and improvements, mainly dealing with the interest rate. The present paper claims their suggestion while valid, is unnecessary, since this theory already incorporates that element, at least implicitly.

Abstract
Heumer and I debate animal rights, utilitarianism, libertarianism, morality and philosophy. We agree that suffering is a problem, and diverge, widely, on how to deal with it. I maintain that this author's reputation as a libertarian, let alone an intellectual leader of this movement, is problematic. Why? That is because libertarianism, properly understood, is a theory of intra-human rights; this philosophy says nothing about right from an extra-human perspective, Heumer to the contrary notwithstanding. That is to say, he is improperly importing into the freedom philosophy considerations extraneous to it.

This essay is in honor of Murray N. Rothbard. He made many important, nay, exquisite contributions to belles letters, not limited to economics, history, philosophy, sociology; even to movie reviews of all things. The present essay is an attempt to honor him by making the case for free market anarchism, the thesis that ran through most of his intellect output.

This essay is in honor of Murray N. Rothbard. He made many important, nay, exquisite contributions to belles letters, not limited to economics, history, philosophy, sociology; even to movie reviews of all things. The present essay is an attempt to honor him by making the case for free market anarchism, the thesis that ran through most of his intellect output.

Abstract
This special issue of Studia Humana is devoted, and dedicated, to libertarianism; its promotion and its study. I am very grateful to the editors of this journal for inviting me to put together such a compilation. There are 16 contributions in all, covering most of the social science disciplines.

Abstract
Huemer [33] argues against the killing of animals. I offer a critical libertarian analysis of his claim.

If the minimum wage were as good as its advocates claim, this would be the most efficient way of eliminating poverty. The latter is still with us. This is a pernicious law that raises no one's wages, apart from very temporarily, but creates unemployment for unskilled workers. This paper criticizes arguments in favor of such legislation such as that from monopsony. It disparages econometric studies which purport to demonstrate the benefits of this legislation.

Abstract Only a libertarian would think to base an analysis of the abortion controversy on private property rights. The present paper does just that. On that basis, it concludes that evictionism is the only policy compatible with libertarianism. This essay then uses this analysis to criticize the views on this subject of five scholars associated with this political philosophy: Feser, Goodwin, Mosquito, Sadowsky, Vance and Watkins.