Suchergebnisse

Background: Caribbean graduates contribute significantly to the US healthcare workforce. The accreditation requirements of local governments vary from one Caribbean island to another island. The Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) requirement that all future applicants be graduates from accredited medical schools drove Caribbean medical schools to seek accreditation. Accreditation has been found to significantly impact the educational processes of Canadian medical schools. Our study aims at investigating Caribbean medical school leaders' perceptions of the impact of accreditation on their school's processes. Methods: This qualitative study and data analysis were done using a framework analysis. Academic leaders and faculty members from three different types of Caribbean medical schools (accredited, denied-accreditation schools, never applied for accreditation) were interviewed using semi-structured interviews. Results: A total of 12 participants from six different Caribbean medical schools participated in the interview process. Themes of processes influenced by accreditation at Caribbean medical schools were similar to those found in the Canadian context and align with best practices of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI). Conclusions: Caribbean medical schools are changing their educational processes as a result of accreditation requirements. Some processes are not maintained in a continuous manner, raising questions about the development of a true CQI culture. ; Contexte: Les diplômés des Caraïbes contribuent de manière significative au personnel de santé Américain. Les exigences des gouvernements Caraïbes en matière d'agrément varient d'une île à l'autre. L'Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates, ECFMG (Commission de l'éducation pour les diplômés en médecine étrangers), exige que les candidats soient diplômés de facultés de médecine agréées, ce qui a incité les facultés de médecine des Caraïbes à solliciter l'agrément. Il a été démontré que l'agrément affectait de manière importante les processus éducatifs des écoles de médecine canadiennes. Notre étude vise à examiner les perceptions des directions des facultés de médecine des Caraïbes quant aux répercussions de l'agrément sur leurs processus. Méthodes: La présente étude qualitative et l'analyse des données ont été réalisées selon la méthodologie du cadre logique. Les responsables universitaires et les membres du corps professoral de facultés de médecine des Caraïbes se trouvant dans trois cas de figure différents (facultés agrées, facultés auxquelles l'agrément a été refusé et facultés n'ayant jamais sollicité l'agrément) ont été interrogés par le biais d'entretiens semi-structurées. Résultats: Douze participants de six facultés de médecine de la région des Caraïbes ont participé aux entretiens. Des thèmes similaires se dégagent en ce qui concerne les processus influencés par l'agrément dans les facultés de médecine caribéennes et canadiennes, en particulier l'adoption des pratiques exemplaires en matière d'amélioration continue de la qualité (ACQ). Conclusions: Les facultés de médecine des Caraïbes modifient leurs processus éducatifs afin de remplir les exigences d'agrément. Certains processus ne sont pas maintenus de manière continue, ce qui soulève des interrogations quant à l'implantation d'une véritable culture de l'ACQ.

Background: In Canada, 30%-60% of patients presenting to emergency departments are ambulatory. This category has been labeled as a source of emergency department overuse. Acting on the presumption that primary care practices and walk-in clinics offer equivalent care at a lower cost, governments have invested massively in improving access to these alternative settings in the hope that patients would present there instead when possible, thereby reducing the load on emergency departments. Data in support of this approach remain scarce and equivocal. Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the value of care received in emergency departments, walk-in clinics, and primary care practices by ambulatory patients with upper respiratory tract infection, sinusitis, otitis media, tonsillitis, pharyngitis, bronchitis, influenza-like illness, pneumonia, acute asthma, or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods: A multicenter prospective cohort study will be performed in Ontario and Québec. In phase 1, a time-driven activity-based costing method will be applied at each of the 15 study sites. This method uses time as a cost driver to allocate direct costs (eg, medication), consumable expenditures (eg, needles), overhead costs (eg, building maintenance), and physician charges to patient care. Thus, the cost of a care episode will be proportional to the time spent receiving the care. At the end of this phase, a list of care process costs will be generated and used to calculate the cost of each consultation during phase 2, in which a prospective cohort of patients will be monitored to compare the care received in each setting. Patients aged 18 years and older, ambulatory throughout the care episode, and discharged to home with one of the aforementioned targeted diagnoses will be considered. The estimated sample size is 1485 patients. The 3 types of care settings will be compared on the basis of primary outcomes in terms of the proportion of return visits to any site 3 and 7 days after the initial visit and the mean cost of care. The secondary outcomes measured will include scores on patient-reported outcome and experience measures and mean costs borne wholly by patients. We will use multilevel generalized linear models to compare the care settings and an overlap weights approach to adjust for confounding factors related to age, sex, gender, ethnicity, comorbidities, registration with a family physician, socioeconomic status, and severity of illness. Results: Phase 1 will begin in 2021 and phase 2, in 2023. The results will be available in 2025. Conclusions: The end point of our program will be for deciders, patients, and care providers to be able to determine the most appropriate care setting for the management of ambulatory emergency respiratory conditions, based on the quality and cost of care associated with each alternative.