Suchergebnisse
Filter
54 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Collaborative environmental governance : Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems
Managing ecosystems is challenging because of the high number of stakeholders, the permeability of man-made political and jurisdictional demarcations in relation to the temporal and spatial extent of biophysical processes, and a limited understanding of complex ecosystem and societal dynamics. Given these conditions, collaborative governance is commonly put forward as the preferred means of addressing environmental problems. Under this paradigm, a deeper understanding of if, when, and how collaboration is effective, and when other means of addressing environmental problems are better suited, is needed. Interdisciplinary research on collaborative networks demonstrates that which actors get involved, with whom they collaborate, and in what ways they are tied to the structures of the ecosystems have profound implications on actors' abilities to address different types of environmental problems.
BASE
Ten years of experience with ecological connectivity analysis and urban planning in Sweden
In: Impact assessment and project appraisal, Band 40, Heft 2, S. 146-155
ISSN: 1471-5465
Collective Action Problem Characteristics and Partner Uncertainty as Drivers of Social Tie Formation in Collaborative Networks
In: Policy studies journal: the journal of the Policy Studies Organization, Band 48, Heft 4, S. 1082-1108
ISSN: 1541-0072
The effectiveness of collaboration is often explained by the alignment of social networks with collective‐action problem characteristics, yet previous research on social tie formation has focused almost exclusively on actor and relational attributes. We theorize that collective‐action problem characteristics together with actor and relational attributes explain social tie formation and that the relative effect of these factors varies with uncertainty about collaboration partners. The study tests seven hypotheses associated with these factors by estimating multilevel network models of collaboration and task engagement among managers responding to a major wildfire in Sweden. The combination of actors and tasks in a single model captured key characteristics of the collective action problem (task engagements and task interdependencies), and disentangled the relative effects of these factors from actor and relational attributes. Results suggest that social tie formation can be explained both by actors' task engagements, and actor attributes associated with leadership, professionalization, and experience. Further, the effect of task engagements decreases in organizational relationships where collaborative uncertainty is high. Since the alignment of social ties with problem characteristics is supposedly positively associated with collaborative effectiveness, this finding suggests that risk‐aversion is a more deep‐rooted driver of tie formation than the pursuit of collective performance.
Balancing Costs and Benefits of Collaboration in an Ecology of Games
In: Policy studies journal: the journal of the Policy Studies Organization, Band 47, Heft 1, S. 138-158
ISSN: 1541-0072
The growth of collaborative approaches to governance has resulted in increasingly complex policy and management landscapes, where actors are presented with ever‐increasing numbers of decision‐making venues they can participate in and actors they can collaborate with. Given that actors face constraints on their capacity to manage actor and venue relationships in such polycentric governance systems, we assume the marginal benefit of yet another relationship should begin to diminish at some level of engagement. Furthermore, we hypothesize that such capacity limitations are not static, but decrease as actors learn, develop skills, and formulate strategies for how to navigate complex polycentric systems more effectively. Drawing on the Ecology of Games framework, this article investigates two Swedish collaborative governance initiatives where a multitude of actors came together to address a range of different, but interrelated, policy issues and management tasks. The empirical findings suggest that actors' capacities to successfully navigate polycentric governance arrangements increase as they gain experience and develop their networking skills. Our findings imply there is a need to balance increased complexity in polycentric systems with increased capacity, otherwise the overall effect of an ever‐increasing number of venues and actors could be collaborative fatigue and decreased abilities to address diverse governance challenges.
Evolutionary Dynamics of Crisis Preparedness Collaboration: Resources, Turbulence and Network Change in Swedish Municipalities
In: Risk, hazards & crisis in public policy, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 134-155
ISSN: 1944-4079
Societal responses to climate change risks and hazards increasingly involve interorganizational collaboration across policy areas, sectors, and levels of government. Different views exist in the literature regarding changes in such collaborative arrangements; whereas some argue that maintaining stability of collaborative networks is a precursor for effective crisis management, others maintain that network adaptation is necessary to cope with complex risks and rude surprises. This controversy turns the spotlight on the more fundamental question of what influences changes in collaborative networks in this area. Using survey data on municipality managers in Sweden, this study presents evidence of a dramatic increase in annual change of interorganizational ties while the total magnitude of ties to different types of actors has essentially remained constant over time. To explain these developments, the study builds from resource dependency theory (RDT) and explores the relationship between resources, environmental turbulence, and network change. The findings suggest that RDT has limited explanatory value in this case; no association was found between resources, turbulence, and network change. An alternative hypothesis is introduced suggesting that changes in networking strategies are a function of outside pressure to collaborate and uncertainty about collaborative practices and the benefits of collaboration, which feed an experimental approach to networking.
Power Asymmetries in Small-Scale Fisheries: a Barrier to Governance Transformability?
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 15, Heft 4
ISSN: 1708-3087
What You Know is Who You Know? Communication Patterns Among Resource Users as a Prerequisite for Co-management
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 11, Heft 2
ISSN: 1708-3087
Information Network Topologies for Enhanced Local Adaptive Management
In: Environmental management: an international journal for decision makers, scientists, and environmental auditors, Band 36, Heft 5, S. 772-773
ISSN: 1432-1009
Information Network Topologies for Enhanced Local Adaptive Management
In: Environmental management: an international journal for decision makers, scientists, and environmental auditors, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 175-193
ISSN: 1432-1009
Participation in Multiple Decision Making Water Governance Forums in Brazil Enhances Actors' Perceived Level of Influence
The Ecology of Games Framework (EGF) draws attention to the intertwined nature of different forums in a given policy setting and how this affects governance outcomes. In this article, we associate the EGF with the literature on power asymmetries, in order to investigate hypotheses of actors' perceived level of influence in a forum. Focusing on the Paraíba do Sul river basin committee in Brazil, we specifically explore actors' participation in multiple forums, time spent participating in the basin committee, and actors' degree of involvement in the committee as factors that might explain actors' level of perceived influence in the forum. The findings suggest participation in multiple forums is a key driver of perceived influence and thus highlight a way to challenge traditional power asymmetries. More research, however, is needed to determine to what extent perceived influence is affecting decision-making processes and governance outcomes in the Paraíba do Sul river basin committee.
BASE
Participation in Multiple Decision Making Water Governance Forums in Brazil Enhances Actors' Perceived Level of Influence
In: Policy studies journal: the journal of the Policy Studies Organization, Band 47, Heft 1, S. 27-51
ISSN: 1541-0072
The Ecology of Games Framework (EGF) draws attention to the intertwined nature of different forums in a given policy setting and how this affects governance outcomes. In this article, we associate the EGF with the literature on power asymmetries, in order to investigate hypotheses of actors' perceived level of influence in a forum. Focusing on the Paraíba do Sul river basin committee in Brazil, we specifically explore actors' participation in multiple forums, time spent participating in the basin committee, and actors' degree of involvement in the committee as factors that might explain actors' level of perceived influence in the forum. The findings suggest participation in multiple forums is a key driver of perceived influence and thus highlight a way to challenge traditional power asymmetries. More research, however, is needed to determine to what extent perceived influence is affecting decision‐making processes and governance outcomes in the Paraíba do Sul river basin committee.
Management of Natural Resources at the Community Level: Exploring the Role of Social Capital and Leadership in a Rural Fishing Community
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 36, Heft 12, S. 2763-2779
A diagnostic for evaluating collaborative responses to compound emergencies
In: Progress in disaster science, Band 16, S. 100251
ISSN: 2590-0617
A comparative approach to quantify the heterarchical structures of complex systems
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 27, Heft 3
ISSN: 1708-3087