The following links lead to the full text from the respective local libraries:
Alternatively, you can try to access the desired document yourself via your local library catalog.
If you have access problems, please contact us.
115 results
Sort by:
In: Studies in contemporary German social thought
World Affairs Online
In: Studies in contemporary German social thought
Reviso tres maneras diferentes como los ideales de la democracia deliberativa han cambiado a la luz de las preocupaciones prácticas sobre su viabilidad, es decir, haciendo cada vez más importante el problema de cómo este ideal puede acercarse a sociedades caracterizadas por profundos desacuerdos, problemas sociales de enorme complejidad e instrumentos inoperantes en sus instituciones existentes. En primer lugar, las teorías de la democracia deliberativa enfatizan el proceso mismo de la deliberación, y no sus condiciones y procedimientos ideales y contrafácticos. En segundo lugar, los demócratas deliberativos se interesan cada vez más en los problemas de la institucionalización, en hacer del voto, la regla de mayorías, la representación, los tribunales y el derecho constitucional, instituciones más deliberativas, en pro de una mayor democracia directa. En tercer lugar, los deliberativistas se ocupan de examinar y comparar los diferentes escenarios y procedimientos de la deliberación, señalando problemas empíricos y obstáculos que no siempre pueden anticiparse al recurrir únicamente a argumentos conceptuales. ; I will be reviewing three different ways in which the ideals of deliberative democracy have changed in light of practical concerns of feasibility, that is, by making the problem of how this ideal would be approximated increasingly central in societies characterized by deep disagreements, social problems of enormous complexity and also consider the blunt instruments of available institutions. First, theories of deliberative democracy have come to emphasize the process of deliberation itself, rather than its ideal and counterfactual conditions and procedures. Second, deliberative democrats have become increasingly interested in the problems of institutionalization, of making institutions such as voting and majority rule, representation, courts and constitutional law more deliberative rather than rejecting them for more direct democracy. Third, these aforementioned democrats are concerned with examining and comparing different settings and procedures of deliberation, pointing out empirical problems and obstacles that cannot always be anticipated by conceptual argument alone.
BASE
In: Critical horizons: a journal of philosophy and social theory, Volume 17, Issue 1, p. 123-134
ISSN: 1568-5160
In: Citizenship studies, Volume 19, Issue 5, p. 520-534
ISSN: 1469-3593
In: Zeitschrift für politische Theorie, Volume 5, Issue 1, p. 83-96
ISSN: 2196-2103
In: Ethics & international affairs, Volume 28, Issue 3, p. 402-404
ISSN: 1747-7093
In: Zeitschrift für politische Theorie: ZPTh, Volume 5, Issue 1, p. 1
ISSN: 1869-3016
In: Ethics & international affairs, Volume 28, Issue 3, p. 402-404
ISSN: 0892-6794
In: Republican Democracy, p. 62-88
In: Journal of social philosophy, Volume 43, Issue 2, p. 97-112
ISSN: 1467-9833
In: Social epistemology: a journal of knowledge, culture and policy, Volume 26, Issue 2, p. 145-147
ISSN: 1464-5297