Suchergebnisse

У статті зроблена спроба розкрити проблему впливу педагогічних поглядів А. С. Макаренка на самоврядування в колективі, аналізується вплив його вчення на систему державного регулювання сучасної освіти, обґрунтовано значення його наукових досягнень у даній проблемі. ; A.S. Makarenko believed that self‐government organization is the important condition of children's collective development, because the independence in initiative manifestation, decision‐making and its realization for the benefit of the collective depend on it. The self‐ government of children's everyday life meant planning and activity arrangement of the collective, analysis of its work, summarizing of what was done and decision‐making. A. Makarenko denied the widespread ideas of that time as for the necessity of activity planning and emphasized that a commanders board was a self‐governing body which had to work according to tasks and themes that aroused every day and couldn't be planned. Thanks to teacher's system of work the commanders board obtained the status of the authorized board.An interesting fact is that Anton Semenovych considered that control was also the function of self‐government, but emphasized that control had to be combined with the organizational function. The progressive idea for that time was that general meetings and commanders board controlled all life activities of the colony and solved the problems of factories work, material costs and changes of the establishment "status".The essence of the proposed self‐government covered all the activity areas of the collective: productive work, self‐service organization, educational process, different aesthetic activities, sports activities, disciplines maintenance, organization of trips and tours. At the same time giving such wide authorities to self‐governing bodies, A.S. Makarenko was confident in the necessity of pedagogical control of their activity which he exercised purposefully and systematically.The article attempts to reveal the problem of the influence of pedagogical views Anton Makarenko to self‐government in the team, indicated by its impact on the public education system of modern education, justified by the value of scientific achievement within a given problem.

У статті зроблена спроба розкрити проблему впливу педагогічних поглядів А. С. Макаренка на самоврядування в колективі, аналізується вплив його вчення на систему державного регулювання сучасної освіти, обґрунтовано значення його наукових досягнень у даній проблемі. ; A.S. Makarenko believed that self‐government organization is the important condition of children's collective development, because the independence in initiative manifestation, decision‐making and its realization for the benefit of the collective depend on it. The self‐ government of children's everyday life meant planning and activity arrangement of the collective, analysis of its work, summarizing of what was done and decision‐making. A. Makarenko denied the widespread ideas of that time as for the necessity of activity planning and emphasized that a commanders board was a self‐governing body which had to work according to tasks and themes that aroused every day and couldn't be planned. Thanks to teacher's system of work the commanders board obtained the status of the authorized board.An interesting fact is that Anton Semenovych considered that control was also the function of self‐government, but emphasized that control had to be combined with the organizational function. The progressive idea for that time was that general meetings and commanders board controlled all life activities of the colony and solved the problems of factories work, material costs and changes of the establishment "status".The essence of the proposed self‐government covered all the activity areas of the collective: productive work, self‐service organization, educational process, different aesthetic activities, sports activities, disciplines maintenance, organization of trips and tours. At the same time giving such wide authorities to self‐governing bodies, A.S. Makarenko was confident in the necessity of pedagogical control of their activity which he exercised purposefully and systematically.The article attempts to reveal the problem of the influence of pedagogical views Anton Makarenko to self‐government in the team, indicated by its impact on the public education system of modern education, justified by the value of scientific achievement within a given problem.

The paper considers possibilities of forming mechanisms of state regulation qualitative in the provision of financial services in Ukraine. Analyzes the effective functioning of the financial system of Ukraine, analysis and adjustment of the financial activities of government and business entities need to manage financial resources as a factor in solving the conflict between the individual and private nature of production and the social purpose of the reproduction process.

This article analyzes intra-party dynamics and the transformation of the role of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF) within the Russian political system. Although the party is considered to be a member of the so-called "loyal" opposition, the increasing volatility of the party system and growing political instability have implications for future relations between the KPRF and the regime. The article argues that despite the organizational strength and demonstrated loyalty to the regime, the party is currently affected by the problem of "dual commitment," epitomized by a growing center-regions cleavage and ideological incoherence. These two vectors of internal divide are shaped by the context emerging from different intra-system trends and by demographic trends affecting the interaction between the leadership and the rank-and-file of the KPRF. While in the wake of some surprising results from the 2021 legislative elections, the party still seems committed to demonstrating loyalty to the regime; in the long run, the growing intra-party cleavage is likely to affect the role of the KPRF within the party system, opening a new window of opportunity for opposition politics in Russian regions.

The article analyzes the military-political threats to Ukrainian statehood in regard to political events in the Russian Federation and a possible military escalation in the Central European region. It is noted that the Russian Federation authorities used the same strategy of regional destabilization with subsequent massive military intervention. The authoritarian Kremlin regime can protect itself exclusively with aggressive external policy and, finding itself on the rubicon of the loss of power, may resort to sharp destabilizing steps including the onset of a full-scale war in Central Europe. The geopolitical processes consisting of the latest events in the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation are analyzed. It is stated that as a result of the Kremlin's aggressive policy, the entire Central European region can be at risk of military escalation. Analysis of the military-political situation indicates that in 2021 a bold plan of the Russian Federation, similar to the aggression against Georgia in 2008 and Ukraine in 2014, may be implemented in the Central European region, the process probably initiated by the armed confrontation in Belarus provoked by the Kremlin's secret services. NATO military analysts have been considering the possibility of Russian military aggression against the Baltic states since 2014, with the most vulnerable point being the Polish-Lithuanian border between Belarus and Kaliningrad region of Russia, the so-called Suwalki Gap. The same vulnerable area of potential instability and hostilities is the border between Belarus and Ukraine. Under the conditions of the occupation of Crimea and the continuation of the undeclared war in Donbas, the hypothetical aggression of the Russian Federation in the North-Western regions of Ukraine threatens the Ukrainian statehood itself. Such a critical strategic threat requires urgent preventive action.