Suchergebnisse

Ein hoher Beschäftigungsstand, so steht es im Stabilitäts- und Wachstumsgesetz von 1967, ist eine entscheidende volkswirtschaftliche Zielgröße. Es muss alles wirtschaftspolitisch versucht werden, um dies zu erreichen. Die Realität ist aber eine völlig andere. Seit Jahrzehnten liegt eine chronische Massenarbeitslosigkeit vor, deren statistische Erfassung verwirrend und für die Öffentlichkeit nicht transparent ist und zudem noch in ihrer Höhe als tatsächlich bestehende Arbeitsplatzlücke zu gering ausgewiesen wird.

The following article is the second part of "The planned man in the enterprise – a strategic workforce planning" (Issue 3/2019). The third chapter of the article deals with the conditions for a labor demand (recruitment), but also with redundancies in a market capitalist enterprise and their influencing factors. This shows that the personnel plan is dependent on the sales, production and investment plan of a company and is also determined by political and legal measures. Annoying in the use of personnel is from the point of view of capital, the economically indeterminate employment contract. The fourth chapter deals with the determination of the quantitative and qualitative human resources needs. Here, special emphasis is placed on a practically never performed grossnet-bill as well as on a calculation of the gross and net working volume. Important in this context are dynamic input-output establishment plans. The final fifth chapter then deals with strategic personnel adjustments in corporate crisis situations to avoid possible redundancies.

In practice, it is always amazing to observe that companies do not have sufficient personnel planning. However, it is also just as astonishing that the working human being in the value-added work-sharing process still does not receive the acknowledgment that is actually due to him as the only new value-adding factor in connection with nature. In contrast,the capital endowed by the dominant bourgeois economy is merely a derivative factor of production, and the neoclassical marginal productivity theory completely bypasses economic reality. However, it is also a fact that the added value created by humans in production must always first be realized on the market. However, the risks that arise here do not necessarily affect only the owners of the capital but also the employees. They are general business risks and not just business risks.All of this is worked out in the first chapter of the article and made calculable and verifiable in the second chapter. On the basis of business-related (derived) added value, these include various key personnel policy indicators that reveal valuebased labor intensity and labor productivity as well as the distribution of added value in the wage and value added quota. In the third chapter of the article (Part 2 (4/2019)), the conditions for a labor demand (recruitment), but also for redundancies in a market-capitalist enterprise, and their influence are shown. This shows that the personnel plan is dependent on the sales, production and investment plan of a company and is also determined by political and legal measures. Annoying in the use of personnel is from the point of view of capital, the economically indeterminate employment contract. The fourth chapter deals with the determination of the quantitative and qualitative human resources needs. Here, special emphasis is placed on a practically never performed gross-net-bill as well as on a calculation of the gross and net working volume. Important in this context are dynamic input-output establishment plans. The final fifth chapter then deals with strategic personnel adjustments in corporate crisis situations to avoid possible redundancies.

"Die seit langem praktizierte neoliberale Umverteilung von den Arbeits- zu den Besitzeinkünften hat die Welt ungleicher denn je gemacht. Auf der einen Seite wuchs der Reichtum und auf der anderen Seite die Armut. Auch in Deutschland. Das eine Gesellschaft zusammenhaltende Soziale droht immer mehr auseinander zu brechen. Dies hat nicht nur schwerwiegende negative soziale, sondern auch die Krise verschärfende ökonomische Folgen. Ohne eine im Gegensatz zum Neoliberalismus völlig andere Wirtschafts- und Ordnungspolitik wird es daher zu einer gefährlichen Vertiefung der Umverteilungskrise kommen." (Autorenreferat)