Book review
In: European journal of work and organizational psychology: the official journal of The European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, Band 16, Heft 3, S. 346-349
ISSN: 1464-0643
13 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: European journal of work and organizational psychology: the official journal of The European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, Band 16, Heft 3, S. 346-349
ISSN: 1464-0643
In: European psychologist, Band 16, Heft 3, S. 187-197
ISSN: 1878-531X
This study aimed at exploring the role of the context in shaping collective efficacy beliefs, at both group and organizational level, and their differential relationship with organizational commitment. Employees (N = 1,741) of a multinational financial company were administered a questionnaire measuring collective efficacy, perceptions of context (PoC), and organizational commitment. Two facets of collective efficacy were investigated, namely group and organizational, and their respective relationship with PoC and organizational commitment. Group and organizational efficacy were found to be two different dimensions of collective efficacy. Structural equation models supported the hypothesized relationship among variables. Perceptions of top management displayed a stronger relationship with collective efficacy at the organizational level, whereas perceptions of the direct superior were related to collective efficacy at the group level. Organizational collective efficacy had a stronger relationship with organizational commitment than did group collective efficacy.
In: European psychologist: official organ of the European Federation of Psychologists' Associations (EFPA), Band 16, Heft 3
ISSN: 1016-9040
In: Equality, diversity and inclusion: an international journal, Band 43, Heft 4, S. 610-631
ISSN: 2040-7157
PurposeDrawing on Shore and colleagues' model of inclusive workplaces (2018) and the perceptions of social context framework (Borgogni et al., 2010), this study aims to develop and provide a preliminary validation of the Social Drivers of Inclusive Workplaces (SDIW) scale.Design/methodology/approachUsing inductive and deductive approaches, items were developed. The resulting pool of 28 items was administrated to 1,244 employees using an anonymous online survey. The factor structure of the SDIW scale was tested through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliabilities were estimated. Alternative models were tested through CFAs. Nomological validity and measurement invariance across gender were explored.FindingsThe EFA revealed a three-factor structure, including inclusive colleagues, supervisors and top management. This solution was confirmed by the CFA and outperformed all alternative models, showing good reliabilities. Measurement invariance across gender was confirmed. Correlations indicated that the SDIW total score and each dimension were positively associated with belongingness needs satisfaction and affective commitment, while negatively related to interpersonal strain, negative acts and turnover intention.Practical implicationsThis study provides practitioners with a reliable tool to map social drivers of inclusion within workplaces in order to design tailored interventions.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the inclusion literature, as it is the first to provide a scale that simultaneously measures employees' perceptions of inclusive behaviours enacted by the three main social actors within the workplace.
In: European journal of work and organizational psychology: the official journal of The European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, Band 24, Heft 4, S. 560-577
ISSN: 1464-0643
In: International public management journal, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 385-403
ISSN: 1559-3169
In: Journal of vocational behavior, Band 83, Heft 2, S. 209-217
ISSN: 1095-9084
In: European journal of work and organizational psychology: the official journal of The European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, Band 21, Heft 6, S. 875-898
ISSN: 1464-0643
In: International public management journal, Band 13, Heft 3, S. 275-296
ISSN: 1559-3169
In: European psychologist, Band 14, Heft 4, S. 363-371
ISSN: 1878-531X
Employees (N = 170) of a City Hall in Italy were administered a questionnaire measuring collective efficacy (CE), perceptions of context (PoC), and organizational commitment (OC). Two facets of collective efficacy were identified, namely group and organizational. Structural equation models revealed that perceptions of top management display a stronger relationship with organizational collective efficacy, whereas employees' perceptions of their colleagues and their direct superior are related to collective efficacy at the group level. Group collective efficacy had a stronger relationship with affective organizational commitment than did organizational collective efficacy. The theoretical significance of this study is in showing that CE is two-dimensional rather than unidimensional. The practical significance of this finding is that the PoC model provides a framework that public sector managers can use to increase the efficacy of the organization as a whole as well as the individual groups that compose it.
In: European psychologist: official organ of the European Federation of Psychologists' Associations (EFPA), Band 14, Heft 4
ISSN: 1016-9040
In: The International journal of conflict management: IJCMA
ISSN: 1758-8545
Purpose
By integrating the conservation of resources and the emotion-as-social-information theories, this study aims to question whether the leader's effort to calm down when team members perceive intra-team conflict (ITC) may have a counterproductive effect on their interpersonal functioning. Specifically, the authors investigated whether team members with higher individual perceptions of ITC would be more likely to experience interpersonal strain (ISW) when their team leaders downregulate or suppress their emotional responses (i.e. high interpersonal modulation of emotional responses [MER]). A further objective of the study was to examine whether this exacerbating effect would be conditional on the leader's sex.
Design/methodology/approach
Data were collected from 236 white collars nested in 48 teams (Msize = 6.23; SDsize = 2.69) and their respective team leaders (56.7% men) of a large organization providing financial services.
Findings
Multilevel model results showed that team members confronted with higher ITC experienced higher ISW levels, especially when the leader's interpersonal modulation of team members' emotional responses was high (vs low). This effect was stronger when the interpersonal modulation was enacted by women (vs men) team leaders.
Originality/value
This study moves an important step forward in the conflict and ISW literature, as it is the first to identify a leader's MER and sex as key boundary conditions under which ITC is related to team members' ISW. The implications of these findings for theory and practice are discussed.
In: Human relations: towards the integration of the social sciences, Band 69, Heft 11, S. 2047-2067
ISSN: 1573-9716, 1741-282X
Giving the crucial role of organizational context in shaping individual attitudes and behaviors at work, in this research we studied the effects of collective work-unit perceptions of social context on individual work resilience and two key individual outcomes: job satisfaction and job performance as rated by the supervisor. We theorized that collective perceptions of social context act as antecedents of individual variables, and that individual job satisfaction mediates the relationship between collective perceptions of social context and job performance, and between work resilience and job performance over time. A sample of 305 white-collar employees, clustered in 67 work-units, participated in the study. Hierarchical linear modeling highlighted that collective perceptions of social context are significant related to individual work resilience. Moreover, results showed that individual job satisfaction fully mediates the relationship between collective perceptions of social context and individual job performance and the relationship between individual work resilience and individual job performance. At a practical level, results suggest that interventions on collective perceptions of social context may increase work resilience, job satisfaction and job performance over time at the individual level.