Professionalism meets entrepreneurialism and managerialism1
In: Rethinking professional governanceInternational directions in healthcare, S. 77-92
9 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Rethinking professional governanceInternational directions in healthcare, S. 77-92
In: International journal of public sector management, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 141-152
ISSN: 1758-6666
This paper investigates a case whereby the historical monopoly of a medical college was challenged by internal dissenters and also by external pressure in the form of national competition policy. The case is particularly notable in that the apparently private domain of medical training is now subject to explicit public involvement of a transparent and regulated nature. Based on in‐depth interviews and primary documents, the paper argues that in contributing to marketisation, the latent schism and tensions within Australian general practice have, consequently contributed to a decrease in professional autonomy and independence.
In: International journal of public sector management: IJPSM, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 141-152
ISSN: 0951-3558
In: Policy & politics, Band 23, Heft 1, S. 3-16
ISSN: 1470-8442
In: Policy & politics: advancing knowledge in public and social policy, Band 23, Heft 1, S. 3-16
ISSN: 0305-5736
In: Australian journal of public administration, Band 63, Heft 2, S. 16-30
ISSN: 1467-8500
This article examines the development of two distinct models of organising allied health professionals within two public sector health service organisations in Australia. The first case illustrated a mode of organising that facilitated a culture that focused on asset protection and whose external orientation was threat oriented because its disparate multiple identities operated as a fractured, fragmented and competitive set of profession disciplines. In this milieu, there was no evidence of entrepreneurial approaches being used. In contrast, the second case study illustrated a mode of organising that facilitated an entrepreneurial culture that focused on asset growth and an external orientation that was opportunity oriented because of the evolution of a strong superordinate allied health identity that operated as a single united health services stakeholder. This evolution was coupled with the emergence of a corporate boardroom model of management that is consonant with Savage et al. (1997) IDS/N model of management. Once this structure and strategy were in place, corporate entrepreneur ship became the modus operandi. Consequently, because the case study was a situation where corporate entrepreneurship existed in the public sector, it was possible to compare the factors that stimulate corporate entrepreneurship in Sadler's (2000) study with factors that were observed in our study.
In: Australian journal of public administration: the journal of the Royal Institute of Public Administration Australia, Band 63, Heft 2, S. 16-30
ISSN: 0313-6647
In: Evidence & policy: a journal of research, debate and practice, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 53-68
ISSN: 1744-2656
This article discusses research capacity building and its relevance for health practitioners using allied health professionals (AHPs) as a case example. Allied health professionals is a term used to represent a diverse group of health workers, each with a discrete clinical focus, whose needs for research capacity building are likely to be similar to one another and to other medical and nursing professionals. The work of AHPs challenges many current research paradigms being complex and multidisciplinary in nature, often delivered in community settings and focusing on holistic outcomes. This article examines some of the current drivers in the healthcare context and highlights tensions for AHPs in developing their research base in basic science and applied health research. The authors argue for a strategic approach to research capacity building and examine the implications of current policy initiatives for AHP roles and activity in research. The importance of a sustained approach to capacity building is underscored.
This original and innovative book opens up new perspectives in health policy debate, examining the emerging international trends in the governance of health professions and the significance of national contexts for the changing health workforce. In bringing together research from a wide range of continental European countries as well as the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia, the contributors highlight different arenas of governance, as well as the various players involved in the policy process. They expand the public debate on professional governance - hitherto mainly limited to medical self-regulation - to encompass a broad span of health care providers, from nurses and midwives to alternative therapists and health support workers. The book provides new data and geopolitical perspectives in the debate over how to govern health care. It helps to better understand both the enabling conditions for, and the barriers to, making professionals more accountable to the interests of a changing public. This book will be a valuable resource for students at an undergraduate and postgraduate level, particularly for health programmes, sociology of professions and comparative health policy, but also for academics, researchers and managers working in health care.