Report of the ENETWILD workshop: "Harmonizing wild boar monitoring in South Eastern Europe: Progress meeting of the ENETWILD consortium": Senj, Croatia 17‐18th September 2019
In: EFSA supporting publications, Band 17, Heft 1
ISSN: 2397-8325
13 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: EFSA supporting publications, Band 17, Heft 1
ISSN: 2397-8325
In: EFSA supporting publications, Band 17, Heft 5
ISSN: 2397-8325
In: EFSA supporting publications, Band 17, Heft 1
ISSN: 2397-8325
In order to define the spatial interface between wild boar and domestic pigs in Europe, the ENETWILD consortium (www.enetwild.com) described in a preliminary report the different sources of data for domestic pigs at European scale, and developed a preliminary risk map of possible spatial interaction between both groups. This modelexplored and assessed the use of pig distribution data from Gridded Livestock of the Worlddatabase (GLW), FAO. However, in some specific countries used as cases, the GLW predictions did not reliably represent the pig abundance distribution within countries. The currently available census data of livestock at the European Union level (Eurostat) is limited to the spatial resolution at NUTS2. While Eurostat ensures that data can be potentially comparable,there is still needed to resolve definition issues regarding better spatial resolution (level of aggregation of information) and the pig production systems. In this context, the objectives of this report are (i) assessing the spatial interface between pigs and wild boar over Europe using the best quality data available (Eurostat data and ENETWILD spatial models). We(ii) secondly assessed the interface at higher spatial resolution, distinguishing pig production types in countries where data was available. Based on comparisons at different scales and quality of data, we propose future steps in both data collection and modelling approach.Precisespatial resolution of pig data is not available at European level yet, and the discrimination of extensive vs. intensive farms, backyards vs. commercial; outdoor vs. indoor, is essential to quantify and perform risk analyses separatelyfor each production system and/or considering this relevant source of variation in risk at the interface. The development of a framework to collect harmonised and standardised data at European scale athigher resolution is needed. ; Peer reviewed
BASE
In: EFSA supporting publications, Band 18, Heft 1
ISSN: 2397-8325
In: EFSA supporting publications, Band 15, Heft 12
ISSN: 2397-8325
In: EFSA supporting publications, Band 18, Heft 8
ISSN: 2397-8325
In: EFSA supporting publications, Band 16, Heft 8
ISSN: 2397-8325
In: EFSA supporting publications, Band 19, Heft 10
ISSN: 2397-8325
In: EFSA supporting publications, Band 19, Heft 2
ISSN: 2397-8325
In: EFSA supporting publications, Band 17, Heft 12
ISSN: 2397-8325
In: EFSA supporting publications, Band 20, Heft 2
ISSN: 2397-8325
In: EFSA supporting publications, Band 16, Heft 9
ISSN: 2397-8325