Compensation strategy at mcdonnell douglas corporation
In: Employment relations today, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 11-17
ISSN: 1520-6459
7 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Employment relations today, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 11-17
ISSN: 1520-6459
In: Air University review: the professional journal of the US Air Force, Band 28, S. 42-52
ISSN: 0002-2594, 0362-8574
In: The public opinion quarterly: POQ, Band 38, Heft 3, S. 372
ISSN: 1537-5331
In: Public opinion quarterly: journal of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Band 38, Heft 3
ISSN: 0033-362X
In: Public opinion quarterly: journal of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Band 38, Heft 3, S. 372-378
ISSN: 0033-362X
In survey research, the term "reliability" has been used to denote a number of different concepts. This variety in usage has created conceptual confusion. The bases for the different usages are discussed, & recommendations to increase clarity of terminology are made. The use of "reliability" can be broken into 2 major categories: those which pertain to sampling-error variance & those which pertain to measurement-error variance. The statistical respects in which sampling variance & measurement variance are similar are reviewed to explain why the same term has been employed to describe both. The uses of "reliability" to describe specific types of measurement & sampling error variance are delineated. The major implication of the multiple usage of "reliability" is that attention has been distracted from the importance of conceptualizing & measuring all types of error variance in a survey. Survey researchers often do not give adequate consideration to the effects of measurement variance, while test developers often do not give adequate consideration to the effects of sampling variance. To improve clarity of terminology, the term "precision" should be used whenever reference is being made to sampling variance. Whenever reference is being made to measurement variance, the term "psychometric reliability" should be used if there is some possibility that the usage of "reliability" alone will be misconstrued. Careful use of clearly defined & mutually understood terminology should result in more clarity of conceptualization. AA.
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 40, Heft 5, S. 513
ISSN: 1540-6210