Suchergebnisse

Half-Title Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Foreword -- Rape and its Aftermath -- The Therapeutic Jurisprudence Lens -- Values and Balancing -- Progress -- Human Rights -- Criminal Injuries Compensation -- Contestation and Challenges -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Table of Cases -- Table of Statutes -- 1. Prologue: The Contest Continues -- Equality (and Law Reform): A Doomed Enterprise? -- The Skewed Scales: Why Balancing is Problematic -- Our Approach: Beyond Balancing -- In the Following Chapters -- Lexiconical Postscript: 'Reasonable' Doubts about the Language of Rape -- 2. Contesting Consent: A Free and Voluntary Standard? -- Introduction: The Legal Contestability of Consent -- Statutory Definitions of Consent: Free and Voluntary Agreement -- The Meaning of Consent: Towards a Positive Consent Standard -- Policing 'Free and Voluntary' Consent: Sex, Lies and Other Mistakes -- The Modern Approach to Consent: Contesting Context -- Conclusion -- 3. Contesting Partner Intimacy and Abuse of Trust -- Legal Fiction or Non-Fiction -- The Societal Narrative -- An IP SV Trial as Carroll's Wonderland: the Hypothetical Case of R v Davis -- The Way Ahead - Again, and Again -- 4. Contesting Fault: Beyond Legal Binaries -- Reading Between the Fault Lines of Rape Law:A Fundamental or Flawed Principle? -- Honest but Unreasonable Mistake: A Rapists' Charter or (In)credible Defence? -- Contesting Fault under the Griffith Code: What is Wrong with Strict Liability? -- Contesting Rape Trial Narratives: The (Un)intended Effects of Jury Directions -- Assessing Reasonableness of Mistaken Beliefs: A False Promise of Reform? -- Reconstructing Fault Lines for Rape: Pre-Crime and Post-Crime Responsibility -- Conclusion -- 5. Contesting Harms: Primary and Secondary Trauma -- Facts -- How Many Times Will Jane Be Cross-Examined?.

Pt. I. Theoretical and ethical perspectives --The rule of law, legal positivism and states of emergency /Tom Campbell --Civil emergencies and the claims of innocence /John Kleinig and Tziporah Kasachkoff --The right of life between absolute and proportional protection /Kai Möller --Can states commit crimes? /Andrew Vincent --Law, death and denial in the 'Global War on Terror' /Russell Hogg --pt. II. Legal frameworks for shooting to kill --Shooting to kill innocents : necessity, self-defence and duress in the Commonwealth criminal code /Ian Leader-Elliott --Regulating reasonable force : policing in the shadows of the law /Simon Bronitt and Miriam Gani --When shooting to kill is authorised by the state : a feminist analysis /Kylie Weston-Scheuber --Fundamental rights and findamental difference : comparing the right to human dignity and criminal liability in Germany and Australia /Saskia Hufnagel --pt. III. Shooting to kill in context : case studies --The fatal police shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes : is anyone responsible? /Ian Gordon and Seumas MIller --The use of lethal force in counter-piracy operations offi Somalia /Douglas Guilfoyle and Andrew Murdoch --Unlawful killing with combat drones : a case study of Pakistan, 2004-2009 /Mary Ellen O'Connell --Corporations that kill : prosecuting Blackwater /David Kinley and Odette Murray.