Suchergebnisse

Contemporary literature on technological choice in less developed countries is often concerned with identifying appropriate technologies for industrialization strategies. Techniques that make optimum use of local resources while maximizing social welfare are now thought more appropriate than advanced techniques with their high capital costs & minimal job creation. Ghana is one country that has pledged itself to fostering small-scale Ru industries that use appropriate technologies. Because there is, at present, little information on which effective policies can be based, an attempt is made to provide detailed information for one such industry -- narrow-loom weaving -- focusing attention on the technology & organization of the craft & the problems inherent in attempting to improve it. The data are derived from fieldwork in a group of weaving villages near Kumasi in the Ashanti region of Ghana. The households in one such village were enumerated & all resident full-time weavers surveyed using both a precoded, structured questionnaire & informal, open-ended interviews (N = 145). The major problem faced by weavers in the area is not technology or markets, but the cost & availability of raw materials, which can only be solved by governmental action. The relevance of this study to Ghana's policy of fostering Ru industries is discussed, suggesting that specific government policy toward such industries is needed, but that even more important are the government's general policies on Ru investment & technological choice. If these neglect Ru development & show a continued bias toward advanced technologies, then Ru industries using traditional techniques will inevitably disappear. 1 Table, 3 Photographs. Modified AA.

AbstractCan the same person be responsible for evaluation and implementation? What are the limits of self‐evaluation?