Suchergebnisse

L'étude comparée de deux questions ouvertes de sondage sur le tri des déchets et les économies d'énergie (Brugidou, Moine, 2010) met en évidence l'importance des différences entre ces énoncés de stigmatisation - qui traduisent la présence d'une norme et la justifient par la sanction d'une transgression - et des énoncés de dénonciation, assimilables à des nous les avons définis, critiquant les dispositifs de politiques publiques implémentant ces normes. La première partie de l'étude se focalise pour l'essentiel sur la dimension socio-linguistique de l'analyse. A partir de la notion de compétence linguistique, elle montre, qu'au-delà des différences liées aux objets de ces deux questions ouvertes, les propriétés syntaxiques, sémantiques et pragmatiques des réponses sont proches. Elle permet notamment de mettre en évidence la présence dans ces deux corpus d'énoncés de stigmatisation. La deuxième partie de l'étude est consacrée à caractériser les différences entre énoncés de dénonciations - qui bien que plus rares, ne sont pas absents des réponses surtout celles concernant le tri des déchets - et énoncés de stigmatisation.

L'étude comparée de deux questions ouvertes de sondage sur le tri des déchets et les économies d'énergie (Brugidou, Moine, 2010) met en évidence l'importance des différences entre ces énoncés de stigmatisation - qui traduisent la présence d'une norme et la justifient par la sanction d'une transgression - et des énoncés de dénonciation, assimilables à des nous les avons définis, critiquant les dispositifs de politiques publiques implémentant ces normes. La première partie de l'étude se focalise pour l'essentiel sur la dimension socio-linguistique de l'analyse. A partir de la notion de compétence linguistique, elle montre, qu'au-delà des différences liées aux objets de ces deux questions ouvertes, les propriétés syntaxiques, sémantiques et pragmatiques des réponses sont proches. Elle permet notamment de mettre en évidence la présence dans ces deux corpus d'énoncés de stigmatisation. La deuxième partie de l'étude est consacrée à caractériser les différences entre énoncés de dénonciations - qui bien que plus rares, ne sont pas absents des réponses surtout celles concernant le tri des déchets - et énoncés de stigmatisation.

L'étude comparée de deux questions ouvertes de sondage sur le tri des déchets et les économies d'énergie (Brugidou, Moine, 2010) met en évidence l'importance des différences entre ces énoncés de stigmatisation - qui traduisent la présence d'une norme et la justifient par la sanction d'une transgression - et des énoncés de dénonciation, assimilables à des nous les avons définis, critiquant les dispositifs de politiques publiques implémentant ces normes. La première partie de l'étude se focalise pour l'essentiel sur la dimension socio-linguistique de l'analyse. A partir de la notion de compétence linguistique, elle montre, qu'au-delà des différences liées aux objets de ces deux questions ouvertes, les propriétés syntaxiques, sémantiques et pragmatiques des réponses sont proches. Elle permet notamment de mettre en évidence la présence dans ces deux corpus d'énoncés de stigmatisation. La deuxième partie de l'étude est consacrée à caractériser les différences entre énoncés de dénonciations - qui bien que plus rares, ne sont pas absents des réponses surtout celles concernant le tri des déchets - et énoncés de stigmatisation.

Progress regarding the theory and methodology of public opinion polls is now allowing us to envisage experimental survey devices which give more room for open-ended questions, or for sequences which combine open and closed questions. They thus make it possible to build veritable corpuses of "expressed public opinion". This article attempts to present the collections formed by the responses to these devices, by examining their pretension of constituting political corpuses. We do not set out the tools or the methods - in particular the analysis of textual data applied to this type of corpus - but instead we identify the socio-political and linguistic conditions which govern the creation of such corpuses and which also partly determine the strategies for analysis and interpretation. Such an enterprise means looking first of all at the notion of "the political discourses of ordinary citizens", and then examining the survey from a socio-technical angle by analysing, in particular, its pretensions of constituting an enunciation device. Can an opinion poll constitute a "stage" for public debate? This initial question involves, on the one hand, thinking about the survey's interactions and the skills that it mobilises, along with the types of gain in generality created by the survey "stage", which would enable us to liken a response to a survey's open-ended question to a type of political discourse; and, on the other hand, to think about the statistical representativeness, linked to a conception of political representativeness, of these collection and processing devices. After clarifying these conditions, I will suggest we define corpuses "enunciated public opinion" as sequences of open and closed questions, composed of a chain of interactions created by the succession of question-answer couplets ; I will also provide an example of a device.

Progress regarding the theory and methodology of public opinion polls is now allowing us to envisage experimental survey devices which give more room for open-ended questions, or for sequences which combine open and closed questions. They thus make it possible to build veritable corpuses of "expressed public opinion". This article attempts to present the collections formed by the responses to these devices, by examining their pretension of constituting political corpuses. We do not set out the tools or the methods - in particular the analysis of textual data applied to this type of corpus - but instead we identify the socio-political and linguistic conditions which govern the creation of such corpuses and which also partly determine the strategies for analysis and interpretation. Such an enterprise means looking first of all at the notion of "the political discourses of ordinary citizens", and then examining the survey from a socio-technical angle by analysing, in particular, its pretensions of constituting an enunciation device. Can an opinion poll constitute a "stage" for public debate? This initial question involves, on the one hand, thinking about the survey's interactions and the skills that it mobilises, along with the types of gain in generality created by the survey "stage", which would enable us to liken a response to a survey's open-ended question to a type of political discourse; and, on the other hand, to think about the statistical representativeness, linked to a conception of political representativeness, of these collection and processing devices. After clarifying these conditions, I will suggest we define corpuses "enunciated public opinion" as sequences of open and closed questions, composed of a chain of interactions created by the succession of question-answer couplets ; I will also provide an example of a device.

Progress regarding the theory and methodology of public opinion polls is now allowing us to envisage experimental survey devices which give more room for open-ended questions, or for sequences which combine open and closed questions. They thus make it possible to build veritable corpuses of "expressed public opinion". This article attempts to present the collections formed by the responses to these devices, by examining their pretension of constituting political corpuses. We do not set out the tools or the methods - in particular the analysis of textual data applied to this type of corpus - but instead we identify the socio-political and linguistic conditions which govern the creation of such corpuses and which also partly determine the strategies for analysis and interpretation. Such an enterprise means looking first of all at the notion of "the political discourses of ordinary citizens", and then examining the survey from a socio-technical angle by analysing, in particular, its pretensions of constituting an enunciation device. Can an opinion poll constitute a "stage" for public debate? This initial question involves, on the one hand, thinking about the survey's interactions and the skills that it mobilises, along with the types of gain in generality created by the survey "stage", which would enable us to liken a response to a survey's open-ended question to a type of political discourse; and, on the other hand, to think about the statistical representativeness, linked to a conception of political representativeness, of these collection and processing devices. After clarifying these conditions, I will suggest we define corpuses "enunciated public opinion" as sequences of open and closed questions, composed of a chain of interactions created by the succession of question-answer couplets ; I will also provide an example of a device.

Through an analysis of answers to an open-ended question, this research seeks to demonstrate the argumentative competence of 'laymen' in a salient issue of public debate (in this case the future of nuclear power). The hypothesis is that ordinary citizens, in their justification process, use the same type of rhetorical device that politicians do. This hypothesis can be further refined by postulating that these topoi, self-evident propositions that are shared by all & that therefore remain implicit in the enthymeme, are values. The Alceste method used here favors a statistical approach that identifies, within a given text corpus (the answers to the open-ended question), homogeneous subsets of verbatims on the basis of their lexical profile. The classes of answers garnered can be characterized by the available sociological variables in the survey, whether they are sociodemographic or attitudinal. By classifying free responses used to justify an initial stand, we can identify typical arguments. We then show how it is possible to reconstruct a rhetorical syllogism, or enthymeme, & thus attempt to retrieve the implicit value supporting the reasoning. 3 Tables, 2 Figures, 1 Appendix, 25 References. Adapted from the source document.