Suchergebnisse
Filter
9 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Isolated experiences: Gilles Deleuze and the solitudes of reversed Platonism
In: SUNY series in contemporary continental philosophy
From the Ground Truth Up: Doing AI Ethics from Practice to Principles
In: AI and Society, 2022
SSRN
Using edge cases to disentangle fairness and solidarity in AI ethics
In: AI and ethics, Band 2, Heft 3, S. 441-447
ISSN: 2730-5961
Why ESG Investing Needs to be Updated for the AI Economy
In: Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, DOI: 10.1080/20430795.2021.1874212 Forthcoming
SSRN
Deleuze's Postscript on the Societies of Control Updated for Big Data and Predictive Analytics
In: Theoria: a journal of social and political theory, Band 67, Heft 164, S. 1-25
ISSN: 1558-5816
In 1990, Gilles Deleuze publishedPostscript on the Societies of Control, an introduction to the potentially suffocating reality of the nascent control society. This thirty-year update details how Deleuze's conception has developed from a broad speculative vision into specific economic mechanisms clustering around personal information, big data, predictive analytics, and marketing. The central claim is that today's advancing control society coerces without prohibitions, and through incentives that are not grim but enjoyable, even euphoric because they compel individuals to obey their own personal information. The article concludes by delineating two strategies for living that are as unexplored as control society itself because they are revealed and then enabled by the particular method of oppression that is control.
SSRN
Working paper
Co-Design of a Trustworthy AI System in Healthcare: Deep Learning Based Skin Lesion Classifier
In: Frontiers in Human Dynamics, Band 3
ISSN: 2673-2726
This paper documents how an ethically aligned co-design methodology ensures trustworthiness in the early design phase of an artificial intelligence (AI) system component for healthcare. The system explains decisions made by deep learning networks analyzing images of skin lesions. The co-design of trustworthy AI developed here used a holistic approach rather than a static ethical checklist and required a multidisciplinary team of experts working with the AI designers and their managers. Ethical, legal, and technical issues potentially arising from the future use of the AI system were investigated. This paper is a first report on co-designing in the early design phase. Our results can also serve as guidance for other early-phase AI-similar tool developments.
On Assessing Trustworthy AI in Healthcare. Machine Learning as a Supportive Tool to Recognize Cardiac Arrest in Emergency Calls
In: Frontiers in Human Dynamics, Band 3
ISSN: 2673-2726
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to greatly improve the delivery of healthcare and other services that advance population health and wellbeing. However, the use of AI in healthcare also brings potential risks that may cause unintended harm. To guide future developments in AI, the High-Level Expert Group on AI set up by the European Commission (EC), recently published ethics guidelines for what it terms "trustworthy" AI. These guidelines are aimed at a variety of stakeholders, especially guiding practitioners toward more ethical and more robust applications of AI. In line with efforts of the EC, AI ethics scholarship focuses increasingly on converting abstract principles into actionable recommendations. However, the interpretation, relevance, and implementation of trustworthy AI depend on the domain and the context in which the AI system is used. The main contribution of this paper is to demonstrate how to use the general AI HLEG trustworthy AI guidelines in practice in the healthcare domain. To this end, we present a best practice of assessing the use of machine learning as a supportive tool to recognize cardiac arrest in emergency calls. The AI system under assessment is currently in use in the city of Copenhagen in Denmark. The assessment is accomplished by an independent team composed of philosophers, policy makers, social scientists, technical, legal, and medical experts. By leveraging an interdisciplinary team, we aim to expose the complex trade-offs and the necessity for such thorough human review when tackling socio-technical applications of AI in healthcare. For the assessment, we use a process to assess trustworthy AI, called 1Z-Inspection® to identify specific challenges and potential ethical trade-offs when we consider AI in practice.