Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
111 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International banking & finance law series [N.F.], 14
In: Asian commercial, financial and economic law and policy
In: International banking and finance law series [N.F.], 7
In: Global Trade and Finance Ser.
In: International Banking, Finance and Economic Law Series Set Ser.
In: UNSW Law Research Paper No. 24-6
SSRN
In: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Band 36, Heft 2, S. 242-271
SSRN
In: Chapter in Buckley, Avgouleas & Arner (eds), Rethinking Global Finance and Its Regulation (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2016)
SSRN
In: Buckley, R; Avgouleas, E and Arner, D (eds), Rethinking Global Finance and Its Regulation (Cambridge University Press, 2015 Forthcoming)
SSRN
Working paper
In: Forthcoming in Mercurio & Lim (eds), International Economic Law after the Crisis: A Tale of Fragmented Disciplines, Cambridge University Press, 2015, 107-133
SSRN
East Asia's voice in global and economic governance is far smaller than it should be given the region's contribution to world growth and its general significance. The region is under-represented, by any measure, on the International Monetary Fund, the Bank for International Settlements, and the Financial Stability Board. Only in the G20 does the region have fair representation, but because it doesn't speak with a unified voice, even there the region's impact is limited. This article explores how regional nations might work together to rectify this situation and what keeps the region's three largest economies apart on so many issues. In particular, the article explores how Japan needs to take responsibility for its history and understand the price it is paying for not doing so. The article also contrasts China's generally adroit use of aid, soft loans, and other measures to garner influence, with its highly counter-productive belligerence over territorial claims in the South China and East China Seas. The article advances a thesis that might explain this 'split-personality' behavior by China, why in some fora its behavior is subtle and highly effective in attaining its national interests, yet when it comes to territoriality issues it behaves utterly differently and in ways quite adverse to its larger agenda.
BASE
In: University of New South Wales Law Journal, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: 2009, 43(3) The International Lawyer, 1189-1216
SSRN