Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
17 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 81, Heft 3, S. 653-654
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: American political science review, Band 66, Heft 2, S. 604-605
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American anthropologist: AA, Band 65, Heft 6, S. 1418-1419
ISSN: 1548-1433
In: American anthropologist: AA, Band 65, Heft 5, S. 1145-1146
ISSN: 1548-1433
In: International studies in global change 9
In: Prentice-Hall sociology series
In: Journal of peace research, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 221-228
ISSN: 1460-3578
In: Man: the journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 145
In: The meta-power paradigm: impacts and transformations of agents, institutions, and social systems ; capitalism, state, and democracy in a global context, S. 83-105
In: Studies in comparative international development: SCID, Band 11, Heft 2, S. 51-72
ISSN: 1936-6167
In: Studies in comparative international development, Band 11, Heft 2, S. 51-72
ISSN: 0039-3606
The core of exchange theory should be the reciprocal relationship between social structures of inequality & exchange activities which are, therefore, unequal. Social structural factors, above all inequality in power & metapower among actors, are responsible for exchange activity & its outcomes. Exchange activity & its outcomes in turn contribute to the social structuring of power, metapower, & dependence relationships, because they affect resource control, structural position, & the action capabilities of actors in relation to one another through the distribution of payoffs (the terms of exchange) & the structural advantages & disadvantages among the actors involved. International economic exchange in the past & today between the northern & southern parts of the world is, as a rule, unequal exchange, because the countries in the two groups are differentiated systematically on two dimensions: (1) they have unequal productive capabilities to take advantage of potentially positive gains or to prevent & overcome negative outcomes, or they have unequal ability to develop such action capabilities, ie, the ability to restructure themselves or to adapt to changing economic conditions, & (2) as participants in the international exchange system, they have unequal ability to structure the rules & conditions of international exchange so that advantages & disadvantages are more likely to accrue disproportionately to the actors involved. This suggests that full integration into the present international system is not a feasible development strategy, unless the rules of economic exchange are drastically revised in favor of the southern hemisphere. AA.
In: The journal of conflict resolution: journal of the Peace Science Society (International), Band 19, Heft 3, S. 417-440
ISSN: 0022-0027, 0731-4086
World Affairs Online