Suchergebnisse

Peder J. Pedersen & Reinhard Lund (eds.), Unemployment: Theory, Policy, and Structure, Berlin - New York: de Gruyter, 1987, 358 s.; Reinhard Lund, Peder J. Pedersen & Jan Beyer Schmidt-Sørensen (eds.) Studies in Unemployment, Copenhagen: Social Science Monographs, 1987, 220 s.

Henning Jørgensen og Peter Nielsen, Arbejdsformidlingens image og virke, Aalborg: AUC/ATA-projektet, rapport nr. 2, 1985, 85 s., 89,00 kr.; Lene Dalsgaard, Jobskabelse - brikken, der mangler, Aalborg: AUC/ATA-projektet, rapport nr. 3, 1985, 256 s., 149,00 kr.

In public policy literature a classical argument is that the scope and content of decisions shape both the structure of the policy‐making process and the configuration of actors involved. Recent studies have strongly emphasized that the patterns of segmentation and specialization found in national policy‐making are also found in EC policy‐making. Against this background, the present article discusses the conditions and impact of agricultural interests in EC policy‐making in light of the economic crisis of recent years and the increasing budgetary problems faced by the EC. The article illustrates, especially with reference to the Danish case, the special importance of the national interest organization‐government relationship for the strategies pursued by national agricultural interest organizations in influencing EC/CAP policy‐making. Furthermore, the article indicates how policy‐making concerning the CAP has become more complicated as a consequence of the general economic crisis and recent sharp fall in farmers' incomes. National governments are the central actors in the Community policy‐making process, and their impulse to promote exclusive national interests in the Community policy‐making process has increased. In addition, agriculture has been integrated in the overall Community 'crisis' policy, and this development has weakened the segmentation in relation to the CAP. However, because of the general problems of the EC, the national agricultural organizations of the various member states have a growing interest in emphasizing joint activities and mutual agreement with regard to fundamental agricultural issues on Community level. This may affect the role of COPA leaving it primarily as a coordinator and mediator among the various national agricultural organizations, because pressures are more likely to succeed at the national level than at the EC level. This is where 'bread‐and‐butter' agreement really counts in the future. The alternative is that COPA will lose its credibility in EC policy‐making.