Introduction -- Behavioral Public Choice and the Law: The Synthesis of Two Revolutions -- Behavioral Democracy and the Law -- Behavioral Constitutional Economics -- Behavioral Bureaucrats and Administrative Law -- Behavioral Courts and Judicial Doctrines.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
This is the first book that focuses on the entrenched, fundamental divergence between the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal and Macau's Tribunal de Última Instância over their constitutional jurisprudence, with the former repeatedly invalidating unconstitutional legislation with finality and the latter having never challenged the constitutionality of legislation at all. This divergence is all the more remarkable when considered in the light of the fact that the two Regions, commonly subject to oversight by China's authoritarian Party-state, possess constitutional frameworks that are nearly identical; feature similar hybrid regimes; and share a lot in history, ethnicity, culture, and language. Informed by political science and economics, this book breaks new ground by locating the cause of this anomaly, studied within the universe of authoritarian constitutionalism, not in the common law-civil law differences between these two former European dependencies, but the disparate levels of political transaction costs therein.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
AbstractThe health of the planet and its life forms are under threat from anthropogenic climate change, pollution and biodiversity loss, and the extreme weather events, heatwaves and wildfires that accompany them. The burgeoning field of planetary health studies the interplay between humanity and the Earth's biosphere and ecosystems on which human health depends. Scholarship on law from a planetary health vantage point remains scarce. This article fills this gap by delineating the conceptual building blocks of a planetary health law, which, in its latent form, is dispersed across various hard and soft sources of international environmental law and global health law that converge on the right to a healthy environment, and, to a lesser extent, rights of nature emerging in various domestic jurisdictions. It elucidates how the fragmented regimes of international environmental and global health law could be developed in more coherent ways, driven by an overarching concern for the integrity of the planetary foundations of life.
In: Ip, Eric C., Hybrid Constitutionalism: The Politics of Constitutional Review in the Chinese Special Administrative Regions (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press), 2019
In: Eric C Ip, Po Jen Yap, Substantive Review of Administrative Discretion in Hong Kong: Divergence between Judicial Rhetoric and Practice, The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, Volume 7, Issue 1, June 2019, Pages 190–211, DOI/10.1093/cjcl/cxz006
In: Eric C. Ip, 'Hong Kong - Mainland Chinese Enclave in Highspeed Railway Station held Constitutional, Leung Chung Hang Sixtus v President of the Legislative Council [2019] 1 HKLRD 292' (2019) 2019 Public Law 792.
In: Ip, E. C. (2017). Debiasing regulators: The behavioral economics of US administrative law. Common Law World Review, 46(3), 171–197. DOI/10.1177/1473779517725507
In: Ip, Eric C., "Interpreting Interpretations: A Methodology for the Judicial Enforcement of Legislative Interpretations of the Hong Kong Basic Law", Public Law, 2017, v. 2017 n. Oct, p. 552-562
AbstractThe increasing importance of subnational governments in interstate affairs calls for international and comparative law scholars to take subnational foreign relations law more seriously. This article conceives this law as the legal rules that regulate the vertical allocation of foreign relations powers within and across States, and constructs an analytical framework that addresses the questions of why any sovereign would grant extensive foreign relations powers to constituent entities and how such an arrangement plays out in actual practice. This study takes a comparative approach to case studies of the Special Administrative Regions (SARs) of the People's Republic of China: Hong Kong and Macau, which are known for their unusually extensive paradiplomatic powers, which not only defy conventional categories but also surpass those of other substates.