Suchergebnisse

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to comment on "Global implication of the indigenous epistemological system from the East: How to Apply yin-yang balancing to paradox management" by Li (2016). As a pioneer in developing indigenous Chinese management theories, Li has been focused on extracting essential principles of the Chinese yin-yang philosophy and applying them to organization and management phenomena within and outside China (Li, 1998, 2012, 2014a, b). In this paper (Li, 2016), Li sharpens his thinking on the unique attributes of the Chinese yin-yang balancing perspective so as to both distinguish it from and connect it to Western Aristotelian and Hegelian philosophies in regard to contradictions and paradoxes that are increasingly more prevalent in contemporary organizations. The author found Li's paper thought provoking and highly relevant to cross-cultural management research. The author reflects on the yin and yang of the yin-yang perspective itself and discusses how it can be extended for theorizing about cross-cultural or inter-cultural management research.Design/methodology/approachApplying yin-yang dialectics on the East-West cultural differences, this commentary contends that the strengths and weaknesses of the cultural mindsets of the East and the West are relative and potentially complementary to each other, and seeks to balance and integrate Eastern and Western perspectives for theorizing and tackling cultural differences and conflicts in a globalized world.FindingsOn the basis of yin-yang dialectics on cultural differences, a communitarianism model is proposed for cross-cultural researchers to balance and integrate individualism and collectivism, a well-established East-West cultural difference.Originality/valueThe theoretical model of communitarianism builds upon but transcends either Eastern or Western cultural differences toward a viable global value system.

ALTHOUGH THERE ARE SOME FACTORS THAT SEEM TO BE MOVING CHINA AND TAIWAN TOWARD UNIFICATION, THERE ARE MORE THAT SEEM TO SUPPORT THE STATUS QUO. NATIONALISM IS NOT PARTICULARLY STRONG AMONG THE TAIWANESE DUE TO THE FACT THAT THEY HAVE VIRTUALLY NOTHING TO GAIN THROUGH POLITICAL INTEGRATION WITH THE MAINLAND, ESPECIALLY NOW THAT ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND INTEGRATION SEEM LIKELY WITHOUT ANY POLITICAL UNION. IN COMPARISON TO BEIJING'S SINGLE-MINDED AND COHERENT REUNIFICATION POLICY, TAIWAN HAS DISPLAYED MORE DIVERSE, AND SOMETIMES EVEN SELF-CONTRADICTORY, POLICIES TOWARD THE CHINESE MAINLAND. EXTERNALLY, IT IS CLEAR THAT NONE OF THE OUTSIDE FORCES WITH AN INTEREST IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION IS LIKELY TO SHOW A COMPELLING INTEREST IN CHINESE UNIFICATION. ALSO, THERE IS STILL ANIMOSITY AND COMPETITION BETWEEN TAIWAN AND THE MAINLAND IN THE ARENA OF INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMACY. ALTHOUGH THE PRC AND THE ROC ARE RAPIDLY DEVELOPING RELATIONS IN AREAS OTHER THAN POLITICS, THERE ARE TWO RESTRAINING FACTORS THAT SEVERELY RESTRICT THIS BURGEONING INTERACTION: POLITICIZATION AND ASYMMETRY OF POWER.

The ownership restructuring of Chinese state-owned enterprises, launched in 1992, has been one of the most radical and far-reaching market-oriented reforms in the Chinese economy. We studied the effects of ownership reform and individuals' collectivist values on rewards-allocation preferences of employees in Chinese state-owned enterprises, and how these relationships were mediated by employees' productivity goal orientation. We predicted the effects of ownership reform and collectivism on rewards-allocation preferences based on the model of allocation goal priority and the conceptual distinctions of vertical and horizontal collectivism. With data from four pairs of public state-owned enterprises (i.e., listed on the stock market) versus pure state-owned enterprises, we found the following results. First, employees of enterprises that had experienced a greater degree of ownership reform expressed stronger preferences for differential allocation rules (e.g., job position and performance) but weaker preferences for equalitarian allocation rules (e.g., group and individual equality). Second, vertical collectivism was positively related to preferences for differential allocation rules, but horizontal collectivism was positively related to preferences for equalitarian allocation rules. Third, the effects of both ownership reform and vertical collectivism on differential allocation preferences were mediated by productivity goal orientation. Research and practical implications for ownership reform and vertical-horizontal collectivism are discussed.

Despite a significant growth in the scholarly literature in the area of trust violations and repair in the last decade, extant work has largely ignored the complex and socially competent responses of the victims of these violations. Our framework integrates insights from affective events theory, the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions, and theories of cognitive processing to suggest that cognitive flexibility is central to understanding how individuals respond to trust violations. Rather than viewing victims solely as gatekeepers to trust repair, we examine how victims' cognitive processes are influenced by the affective context of those violations, which can, in turn, produce a spectrum of nuanced behavioral responses. We refer to this spectrum as the "swollen middle," the range of behavior that resides between the extremes of impulsive revenge and forgiveness-based, communal cooperation. By integrating psychological theories of emotion and cognitive processing, we seek to highlight the central role of cognitive flexibility in the range of cooperative responses to trust violations. More broadly, we seek to contribute to the emergence of a new paradigm for studying interpersonal trust at work—a paradigm that explores trust-violating events as situated affect-laden experiences that interact with relevant organizational and interpersonal factors to influence employee behavior and trust dynamics in organizations.

Taking a procedural justice perspective, we examined the effect of guanxi practices in human resources management (i.e., making human resources management decisions on the basis of personal relationships) on employees' trust in management in Chinese organizations. Two studies were conducted. In the first, a survey study, we found a negative effect of guanxi practices on trust in management, which was mediated by perceived procedural justice. In the second, an experimental study, we found that the negative effect of guanxi practices varied as a function of guanxi bases: favoring a nephew or a hometown fellow lowered trust, but favoring a college schoolmate or a close friend did not. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.