Suchergebnisse

The discussion of public information disclosure in the village in the midst of a paradigm shift from goverment to governance is very interesting indeed. This places the strategic position of the village community not only as an object of service and development but also as a subject of development in the village. Various facts show that the village has not become a major concern in the development of information disclosure. This research is a descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The required information is collected using narrative interviews, observation and literature study. Informants from the study were determined purposively using snowball sampling. In this article, the four levels of the Williamson model are used to analyze it. The results show that the development of public information institutions in the village in Serang Regency at the macro and micro levels has not supported the realization of information disclosure in the village. It can be seen at level one that various informal rules in the form of traditions, norms and habits that live in rural communities are not yet compatible in supporting the formal rules of information disclosure. At the second level, there has not been any recognition and awareness of either the public or public organizations to fulfill the public's rights regarding the disclosure of public information. At the third level, the institutional governance of public information disclosure has not been developed effectively to be able to minimize transaction costs. At the fourth level, the systematization of rules related to authority, organization, administration, human resources, finance, hierarchical relations, supervision, as well as work procedures and mechanisms need attention.

Tourism is a large sector that includes many things in it. Facilities and infrastructure that can support the life of the tourism sector are not only owned by one party, but involve various stakeholders so that collaboration between these stakeholders is needed to collaborate, but collaborative governance in the development of the Tanjung Lesung Special Economic Zone is still not optimal. The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze collaborative governance in the development of the Tanjung Lesung SEZ. This research is based on the Collaborative Governance Theory from Ansell and Gash. This theory is to examine the collaboration process which includes dimensions including the collaboration process, initial conditions, institutional design, and facilitative leadership. The research method used is a qualitative method with a descriptive approach. Because the main purpose of this study is to describe and provide an explanation of collaborative governance in the development of the Tanjung Lesung SEZ. Informants were determined by purposive sampling and snowball techniques. The data collection technique used is by conducting observations, interviews, literature studies and documentation. The result of this research is that Collaborative Governance in the development of the Tanjung Lesung SEZ has not been implemented optimally. Suggestions from this research are that the community increases its resources so that they can collaborate, the government provides ongoing training to help the community actively collaborate and the government forms a special forum as a forum to communicate and discuss the vision and mission to be achieved together. ; The development of tourism is not only conducted by one stakeholder, but it involves various stakeholders and therefore needs the collaboration among them. The purpose of this research is to describe the collaborative governance in developing the special economic zone of Tanjung Lesung. The description of collaborative governance is based on collaborative governance model that emphasizes four dimensions, namely starting condition, institutional design, facilitative leadership, and collaboration process. Method of this research is descriptive-qualitative method. This research needs primary and secondary data. Primary data of this research are collected by in-depth interview and observation, and secondary data of this research are collected by documentation. The collected data, both primary and secondary, are qualitatively described. Results of this research indicate that the collaborative governance based on the dimensions of starting condition, institutional design, facilitative leadership, and collaboration process in developing the special economic zone of Tanjung Lesung is not optimally implemented yet. This research recommends that the community increases its resources in order to involve in collaboration; the government provides the sustained training to help the community in order to actively collaborate and forms a special forum to communicate and discuss the vision and mission to be commonly achieved in developing the special economic zone of Tanjung Lesung.