Suchergebnisse
Filter
26 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Inter-Member State international law in the EU legal order: Some thoughts on Slovenia v. Croatia
In: Common Market Law Review, Band 58, Heft 5, S. 1473-1490
ISSN: 0165-0750
In defence of Front Polisario: The ECJ as a global jus cogens maker
In: Common Market Law Review, Band 55, Heft 2, S. 569-587
ISSN: 0165-0750
Proportionality and Margin of Appreciation in the Whaling Case: Reconciling Antithetical Doctrines?
In: European journal of international law, Band 27, Heft 4, S. 1061-1069
ISSN: 1464-3596
Whaling into a Spider Web? The Multiple International Restraints to States' Sovereignty
In: European journal of international law, Band 27, Heft 4, S. 1025-1026
ISSN: 1464-3596
THE EFFECT OF THE ECHR ON THE ITALIAN LEGAL ORDER: DIRECT EFFECT AND SUPREMACY
In: The Italian Yearbook of International Law Online, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 171-185
ISSN: 2211-6133
Security Council Resolutions and EC Fundamental Rights: Some Remarks on the ECJ Decision in the Kadi Case
In: Yearbook of European law, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 593-600
ISSN: 2045-0044
Contextualizing proportionality: jus ad bellum and jus in bello in the Lebanese war
In: International review of the Red Cross: humanitarian debate, law, policy, action, Band 88, Heft 864, S. 779-792
ISSN: 1607-5889
AbstractThis article analyses the role and content of proportionality under contemporary international law governing the use of force, with a view to clarifying the legal framework governing the conduct of the parties to an armed conflict. In the system of jus ad bellum, protection is primarily granted to the interest of the attacked state in repelling the attack; the other competing interests are considered only to curtail the choice of the means to be employed in order to achieve that aim. Conversely, in the system of jus in bello there is by definition no prevailing interest, but instead a variety of interests and values which are entitled to equal protection of the law and must be balanced against each other. The existence of two distinct normative systems, with distinct standards of legality applicable to the same conduct, does not as a rule give rise to major problems. The legality of recourse to force is measured against the proportionality of self-defence, whereas individual actions would have to conform to the requirement of proportionality in jus in bello. However, beyond the large area in which these two standards overlap, there might be situations in which the strict application of the jus ad bellum standard makes it impossible to achieve the aims of jus in bello. In these cases, the proportionality test under jus in bello must be regarded as part of the proportionality test under jus ad bellum. States must thus take humanitarian implications into account in determining the level of security they may seek to obtain using military action.
Globalizzazione - Democrazia interna e legittimazione internazionale. A proposito del governo palestinese di Hamas
In: Democrazia e diritto: trimestrale dell'CRS, Band 44, Heft 1, S. 106-114
ISSN: 0416-9565
La doctrine italienne et le développement du droit international dans l'après-guerre : entre continuité et discontinuité
In: Annuaire français de droit international, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 1-23
FRAGMENTED SOVEREIGNTY? THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES IN THE INTERNATIONAL ARENA
In: The Italian Yearbook of International Law Online, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 35-57
ISSN: 2211-6133
ESSAYS: NATO's New Strategic Concept and the Legal Regulation of Use of Force
In: The international spectator: a quarterly journal of the Istituto Affari Internazionali, Italy, Band 36, Heft 1, S. 67-74
ISSN: 0393-2729