Controversies and consensus on the lionfish invasion in the Western Atlantic Ocean
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 20, Heft 3
ISSN: 1708-3087
6 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 20, Heft 3
ISSN: 1708-3087
In: van der Maten , R , Carballo-Cárdenas , E & van Tatenhove , J 2022 , ' Resistance to change : A case study on framing and policy change of a controversial nature area ' , Ecology and Society , vol. 27 , no. 1 , 29 . https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12955-270129
Nature policies can be a major source of long-term debates, in which actors involved define problems differently and are unable to formulate (co-constructed) solutions. Especially issues about the well-being of animals raise heated debate among stakeholders. Though debates over nature policies often span longer periods, they are most likely dealt with on the short term. Policy makers will attempt to solve acute issues, which requires minimal political effort. However, these short-term solutions do not necessarily solve the issue as a whole. This paper analyzes conflicting frames about nature in the Dutch Oostervaardersplassen, and presents an analysis of how the different issues are debated, and framed, over a period of 23 years. Gaining in-depth insight into these frames shows linkages between media attention to issues and policy change. This research shows how diverse and unstable the debate has been over 23 years, by using Punctuated Equilibrium Theory to understand the policy process, and by analyzing the evolution of frames in the media with an Evolutionary Factor Analysis. With the combination of both Punctuated Equilibrium Theory and the Evolutionary Factor Analysis, we can relate issue framing to policy change. This shows that policy is adapted, following rising attention. However, at first the attempts for adaptation by policy makers will be minor, as stability is favored over change, until a certain threshold whereafter policy is changed radically. The article will provide more insight for stakeholders, scientists, and policy makers into the complexity of these kinds of wicked problems. ; Nature policies can be a major source of long-term debates, in which actors involved define problems differently and are unable to formulate (co-constructed) solutions. Especially issues about the well-being of animals raise heated debate among stakeholders. Though debates over nature policies often span longer periods, they are most likely dealt with on the short term. Policy makers will attempt to solve acute ...
BASE
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 27, Heft 1
ISSN: 1708-3087
In: Marine policy, Band 128, S. 104488
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: Marine policy, Band 96, S. 136-144
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: van Tatenhove , J , Ramirez-Monsalve , P , Carballo Cárdenas , E , Papadopoulou , N , Smith , C J , Alferink , L , Ounanian , K & Long , R 2021 , ' The governance of marine restoration: insights from three cases in two European seas ' , Restoration Ecology , vol. 29 , no. S2 , e13288 . https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13288
This article analyses three different cases of assisted marine restoration in Europe to understand how governance and legal aspects enable or constrain marine restoration in practice. The aim of this article is to enhance understanding of the enabling and constraining conditions of the governance of marine ecological restoration. To understand the governance of marine restoration, we use the concepts of governance arrangement and institutionalization. A marine restoration governance arrangement consists of different coalitions of public and private actors, who—through their different ways of conceptualizing and understanding the problem (discourses)—try to influence and design the marine restoration activities and initiatives, the managing of often shared, limited resources, and defining rules of the game (on different levels). Institutionalization refers to the production and reproduction of governance arrangements. This article gives insight in the governance arrangements of three cases: artificial habitat as in the Rigs‐to‐Reefs debate, in the context of North Sea oil and gas decommissioning, and restoration of key sedimentary and hard natural habitats of the fan mussel (Pinna nobilis) and red coral (Corallium rubrum) cases in the Mediterranean. The analysis shows how discourses shape the arrangements that currently govern the decommissioning of obsolete oil and gas structures in the North Sea, and the protection and management of two emblematic and endangered species in the Mediterranean. Based on the analysis we formulated enabling and constraining conditions for the institutionalization of "active restoration" governance arrangements, resulting in recommendations for how to strengthen restoration in policies and legislation. ; This article analyses three different cases of assisted marine restoration in Europe to understand how governance and legal aspects enable or constrain marine restoration in practice. The aim of this article is to enhance understanding of the enabling and constraining conditions of ...
BASE