Suchergebnisse
Filter
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Assessing ethical behavior: the impact of outcomes on judgment bias
In: Journal of managerial psychology, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 52-72
ISSN: 1758-7778
Technology and managing people
In: Journal of labor research, Band 21, Heft 3, S. 447-461
ISSN: 1936-4768
Accommodating claims of disability: The potential impact of abuses
In: Human resource management review, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 233-246
ISSN: 1053-4822
Appraisal Accuracy: The Ability and Motivation to Remember the Past
In: Public personnel management, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 352-357
ISSN: 1945-7421
Institutional theory and HRM: A new look
In: Human resource management review, Band 29, Heft 3, S. 316-335
ISSN: 1053-4822
Employee equity: Toward a person-based approach to HRM
In: Human resource management review, Band 17, Heft 2, S. 140-151
ISSN: 1053-4822
TQM and HRM: Improving Performance Appraisal Research, Theory, and Practice
In: Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 106-115
ISSN: 1936-4490
AbstractThe major characteristics of a TQM organizational environment are reviewed. Assumptions underlying TQM and traditional HRM concerning job performance are contrasted. A model of performance is developed which incorporates and extends both perspectives. Implications of this model for performance appraisal and performance management are considered.RésuméLes auteurs décrivent les principales caractéristiques d'une organisation pratiquant la gestion de la qualité totale (GQT). Après une comparaison de la GQT et de la gestion traditionnelle des ressources humaines en ce qui concerne le rendement individuel, ils proposent un modèle de rendement qui intègre et élargit les deux perspectives. Enfin, ils examinent les implications de ce modèle sur l'évaluation et la gestion du rendement.
Performance Appraisal as Effective Management or Deadly Management Disease: Two Initial Empirical Investigations
In: Group & organization studies, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 143-159
Understanding person and system sources of work variation is fundamental to performance appraisal. Two divergent perspectives on this issue, the traditional human resource management view and the statistical process control view (Deming, 1986), are contrasted. Two studies are reported that investigate two specific questions that arise from a broader view of the appraisal process. Results indicate that managers and subordinates believe that typical poor performance has different causes and that actual productivity levels far outweigh person or system sources of performance variance in appraisal judgments. Implications for performance appraisal practice and research are discussed.
Implications of situational constraints on performance evaluation and performance management
In: Human resource management review, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 105-128
ISSN: 1053-4822