Suchergebnisse

The essay describes how was approached the Transylvanian question during the interwars period in Italy, by a part of the Italian intelligentsia particularly pro Hungarian. Authors and books reflect in somehow the pro Hungary position emerged during the Twenties in Italy, supported by the revisionism of Fascist government and improved during the Thirties. Several books and essays proposed to change the borders between Hungary and Romania, until the Italian-German negotiation and the Vienna Diktat of 1940.

The main political player to support the autonomy for Hungarians in Romania is the Democratic Union of Hungarians in Romania (Romániai Magyar Demokrata Szövetség, RMDSz in Hungarian, in Romanian Uniunea Democrată Maghiară din România, UDMR) (Stein, 2010).

Italian history at the beginning of WWI was well harmonised with other events in the Old Continent, while the domestic picture featured a delicate set of links, between Triplicist, neutralist, and nationalist environments, parties and movements, with "nationalism" acting as a shaping factor in Italy's public scene. But different elements emerged in Italian nationalism that would grow into the interventionist policy of an aspiring "great power", interpreted by some as a line of continuity between liberal and fascist foreign policy. The period of neutrality and the events that led to Italy's intervention were in the spotlight of historiographical analysis in the post-war years, with both focus on fascist Italy's non-belligerance at the surge of WWII and special attention to documentation and the strategies of protagonists (e.g. Giolitti, Salandra, di San Giuliano, Sonnino, D'Annunzio, etc.), as well as to careful reconstruction of events the growing consensus for intervention, the personalisation of stances for and against intervention, the many elements at play within and outside the country and the clever combination of popular mobilisation and parliamentary strategy by supporters of intervention in the weeks between the Treaty of London and war. The goal of the paper is to present the evolution of the Italian position from neutrality to the intervention in the war alongside the Entente, with a particular attention to international context, to the protagonist of the neutrality period in Italy through the memories and the main historiography on the subject. DOI:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s2p737

The essay describes how was approached the Transylvanian question during the interwars period in Italy, by a part of the Italian intelligentsia particularly pro Hungarian.Authors and books reflect in somehow the pro Hungary position emerged during the Twenties in Italy, supported by the revisionism of Fascist government and improved during the Thirties. Several books and essays proposed to change the borders between Hungary and Romania, until the Italian-German negotiation and the Vienna Diktat of 1940 ; Il saggio descrive come è stata affrontata la questione della Transilvania durante il periodo tra le due guerre mondiali in Italia da una parte dell'intellighenzia italiana particolarmente pro ungherese.Autori e libri riflettono in qualche modo la posizione pro Ungheria emersa durante gli anni Venti in Italia, supportata dal revisionismo del governo fascista e amplificata negli anni Trenta. Numerosi libri e saggi proposero di cambiare i confini tra Ungheria e Romania, fino ai negoziati italo-tedeschi e al Diktat di Vienna del 1940