Suchergebnisse

Carbohydrate response element-binding protein (ChREBP) is a transcription factor that mediates glucose signaling in mammalian liver, leading to the expression of different glycolytic and lipogenic genes, such as pyruvate kinase (L-PK) and fatty acid synthase (FAS). The current model for ChREBP activation in response to sugar phosphates holds that glucose metabolization to xylulose 5-phosphate (X-5-P) triggers the activation of protein phosphatase 2A, which dephosphorylates ChREBP and leads to its nuclear translocation and activation. However, evidence indicates that glucose 6-phosphate (G-6-P) is the most likely signal metabolite for the glucose-induced transcription of these genes. The glucose derivative that is responsible for carbohydrate-dependent gene expression remains to be identified. The difficulties in measuring G-6-P and X-5-P concentrations simultaneously and in changing them independently have hindered such identification. To discriminate between these possibilities, we adapted a liquid chromatography mass spectrometry method to identify and quantify sugar phosphates in human hepatocarcinoma cells (Hep G2) and rat hepatocytes in response to different carbon sources and in the presence/absence of a glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase inhibitor. We also used this method to demonstrate that these cells could not metabolize 2-deoxyglucose beyond 2-deoxyglucose-6-phosphate. The simultaneous quantification of sugar phosphates and FAS and L-PK expression levels demonstrated that both X-5-P and G-6-P play a role in the modulation of gene expression. In conclusion, this report presents for the first time a single mechanism that incorporates the effects of X-5-P and G-6-P on the enhancement of the expression of carbohydrate-responsive genes. © 2012 the American Physiological Society. ; This study was supported by the projects SAF2009-12602 and SAF2011-25726 and by RD06/0020/0046 and RD06/0014/0025 from Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Cáncer and Red de Centros FIS-RECAVA, respectively, from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, both funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación-Spanish government and European Regional Development Funds "Una manera de hacer Europa." It has also received financial support from the European Union-funded project ETHERPATHS (FP7-KBBE-222639) (http://www.etherpaths.org/) and from the Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca-Generalitat de Catalunya (2009SGR01308, 2006ITT-10007, and 2009CTP-00026). ; Peer Reviewed

The potential spreading of antibiotic resistance genes (ARG) into agricultural fields and crops represent a fundamental limitation on the use of organic fertilization in food production systems. We present here a study of the effect of spreading four types of organic soil amendments (raw pig slurry, liquid and solid fractions, and a digested derivative) on demonstrative plots in two consecutive productive cycles of corn harvest (Zea mays), using a mineral fertilizer as a control, following the application of organic amendments at 32-62 T per ha (150 kg total N/ha) and allowing 5-8 months between fertilization and harvest. A combination of qPCR and high-throughput 16S rDNA sequencing methods showed a small, but significant impact of the fertilizers in both ARG loads and microbiomes in soil samples, particularly after the second harvesting cycle. The slurry solid fraction showed the largest impact on both ARG loads and microbiome variation, whereas its digestion derivatives showed a much smaller impact. Soil samples with the highest ARG loads also presented increased levels of tetracyclines, indicating a potential dual hazard by ARG and antibiotic residues linked to some organic amendments. Unlike soils, no accumulation of ARG or antibiotics was observed in corn leaves (used as fodder) or grains, and no grain sample reached detection limits for neither parameter. These results support the use of organic soil amendments in corn crops, while proposing the reduction of the loads of ARGs and antibiotics from the fertilizers to greatly reduce their potential risk. ; This work was supported by grants from the LIFE Program of the European Union (LIFE17 ENV/ES/000439), the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and University (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, grant RTI2018-096175-B-I00), and the Generalitat de Catalunya (2017SGR902). CSL was supported by a FI predoctoral fellowship from the Generalitat de Catalunya and the European Social Fund (2018 FI B 00368, ESF Investing in your future). IDAEA-CSIC is a Center of ...