Suchergebnisse

In the last few decades the concept of self-regulation accompanied the process of dismantling the welfare state. In this context, in central countries–Europe and North America–the importance given to private regulations versus public action increased, thus requiring new mechanisms of legitimacy. To this end, appeals to the principles of economy and technical efficiency to legitimate private regulations have been made by several researchers. However, these principles acquired a negative view in Argentina because they were used to use to legitimate processes that led to various crises, especially taking into consideration the neo-liberal experience of the 1990s. Against this historical background, this paper seeks to show a particular case of legitimizing the self-regulation of non-state organizations (social clubs) by using classic topoi, which had been historically used to legitimize state action. In order to do so, this text focuses on the analysis of "Luna de Avellaneda" Act of 2007, by which the government of Buenos Aires sought to legitimize the self-regulation of clubs appealing to the classical values of democracy, participation, and solidarity. For this, the historical experience of the Argentinean political community will be observed from the perspective of the history of these clubs, thus recovering the social function they played in the diverse political and economic crises. ; Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación

This essay of juridical culture, by using elements of conceptual history,intends to analyze the functional changes of the Alcaldía de Barrio ofBuenos Aires, in the period of 1770-1820. Taking as a starting pointthe anachronism made by the police historiography, which tends topresent that institution –the Alcaldía de Barrio– as if it was a "securitypolice" under the paradigm of the State, the article attempts to showthe jurisdictional logic that organized the praxis of that political institution. In order to accomplish that, two concepts become essential–Quietness and public security–, and that is because they synthesizeddifferent principles which guided the praxis of the officials that proceeded as Alcaldes de Barrio, in a period in which the justice and the police were in constant conflict. ; Este ensayo de cultura jurídica utiliza elementos de historia conceptual para analizar la mutación funcional de la Alcaldía de Barrio de Buenos Aires en el período comprendido entre 1770-1820. Partiendo de una crítica al anacronismo de la narrativa policial, se busca, desde una mirada jurisdiccional que servía como modelo de actuación de esa particular institución –la Alcaldía de Barrio–, obturar una mirada estatista que ve en dicha figura una "policía de seguridad". Con dicho fin, y para advertir los principios que guiaban la praxis jurisdiccional de dicha institución, se utilizan de dos conceptos claves: quietud y seguridad pública. Todo ello, tomando en consideración el momento crítico entre las lógicas que gobernaban el ejercicio de un control social, el cual se hallaba tensado entre la justicia a la policía.

On February 20 at the Max Planck Institut für europäische Rechtsgeschichte, the Legal Historian and member of the Constitutional Court of Peru, Dr. Carlos Ramos Núñez, presented a crucial intervention on the problems that face the current constitutionalism in Latin America. Faced with a heterogeneous group of historians, philosophers and theoreticians of law, interested in the vicissitudes of Latin American juridical evolution, the political-juridical tensions of the Peruvian present served him as a framework to raise various constitutional problems and controversies. .

In the last few decades the concept of self-regulation accompanied the process of dismantling the welfare state. In this context, in central countries—Europe and North America—the importance given to private regulations versus public action increased, thus requiring new mechanisms of legitimacy. To this end, appeals to the principles of economy and technical efficiency to legitimate private regulations have been made by several researchers. However, these principles acquired a negative view in Argentina because they were used to use to legitimate processes that led to various crises, especially taking into consideration the neo-liberal experience of the 1990s. Against this historical background, this paper seeks to show a particular case of legitimizing the self-regulation of non-state organizations (social clubs) by using classic topoi, which had been historically used to legitimize state action. In order to do so, this text focuses on the analysis of "Luna de Avellaneda" Act of 2007, by which the government of Buenos Aires sought to legitimize the self-regulation of clubs appealing to the classical values of democracy, participation, and solidarity. For this, the historical experience of the Argentinean political community will be observed from the perspective of the history of these clubs, thus recovering the social function they played in the diverse political and economic crises.

In the last few decades the concept of self-regulation accompanied the process of dismantling the welfare state. In this context, in central countries—Europe and North America—the importance given to private regulations versus public action increased, thus requiring new mechanisms of legitimacy. To this end, appeals to the principles of economy and technical efficiency to legitimate private regulations have been made by several researchers. However, these principles acquired a negative view in Argentina because they were used to use to legitimate processes that led to various crises, especially taking into consideration the neo-liberal experience of the 1990s. Against this historical background, this paper seeks to show a particular case of legitimizing the self-regulation of non-state organizations (social clubs) by using classic topoi, which had been historically used to legitimize state action. In order to do so, this text focuses on the analysis of "Luna de Avellaneda" Act of 2007, by which the government of Buenos Aires sought to legitimize the self-regulation of clubs appealing to the classical values of democracy, participation, and solidarity. For this, the historical experience of the Argentinean political community will be observed from the perspective of the history of these clubs, thus recovering the social function they played in the diverse political and economic crises.

In the last few decades the concept of self-regulation accompanied the process of dismantling the welfare state. In this context, in central countries—Europe and North America—the importance given to private regulations versus public action increased, thus requiring new mechanisms of legitimacy. To this end, appeals to the principles of economy and technical efficiency to legitimate private regulations have been made by several researchers. However, these principles acquired a negative view in Argentina because they were used to use to legitimate processes that led to various crises, especially taking into consideration the neo-liberal experience of the 1990s. Against this historical background, this paper seeks to show a particular case of legitimizing the self-regulation of non-state organizations (social clubs) by using classic topoi, which had been historically used to legitimize state action. In order to do so, this text focuses on the analysis of "Luna de Avellaneda" Act of 2007, by which the government of Buenos Aires sought to legitimize the self-regulation of clubs appealing to the classical values of democracy, participation, and solidarity. For this, the historical experience of the Argentinean political community will be observed from the perspective of the history of these clubs, thus recovering the social function they played in the diverse political and economic crises.

In the last few decades the concept of self-regulation accompanied the process of dismantling the welfare state. In this context, in central countries -Europe and North America- the importance given to private regulations versus public action increased, thus requiring new mechanisms of legitimacy. To this end, appeals to the principles of economy and technical efficiency to legitimate private regulations have been made by several researchers. However, these principles acquired a negative view in Argentina because they were used to use to legitimate processes that led to various crises, especially taking into consideration the neo-liberal experience of the 1990s. Against this historical background, this paper seeks to show a particular case of legitimizing the self-regulation of non-state organizations (social clubs) by using classic topoi, which had been historically used to legitimize state action. In order to do so, this text focuses on the analysis of "Luna de Avellaneda" Act of 2007, by which the government of Buenos Aires sought to legitimize the self-regulation of clubs appealing to the classical values of democracy, participation, and solidarity. For this, the historical experience of the Argentinean political community will be observed from the perspective of the history of these clubs, thus recovering the social function they played in the diverse political and economic crises. ; Fil: Casagrande, Agustín E. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (UNLP-CONICET); Argentina.

In the last few decades the concept of self-regulation accompanied the process of dismantling the welfare state. In this context, in central countries—Europe and North America—the importance given to private regulations versus public action increased, thus requiring new mechanisms of legitimacy. To this end, appeals to the principles of economy and technical efficiency to legitimate private regulations have been made by several researchers. However, these principles acquired a negative view in Argentina because they were used to use to legitimate processes that led to various crises, especially taking into consideration the neo-liberal experience of the 1990s. Against this historical background, this paper seeks to show a particular case of legitimizing the self-regulation of non-state organizations (social clubs) by using classic topoi, which had been historically used to legitimize state action. In order to do so, this text focuses on the analysis of "Luna de Avellaneda" Act of 2007, by which the government of Buenos Aires sought to legitimize the self-regulation of clubs appealing to the classical values of democracy, participation, and solidarity. For this, the historical experience of the Argentinean political community will be observed from the perspective of the history of these clubs, thus recovering the social function they played in the diverse political and economic crises. ; Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación

I. ESPACIO, TIEMPO Y METODOLOGIA . LA HISTORIA DEL DERECHO PUBLICO COMO SABER. II. LA EMERGENCIA DEL IUS PUBLICUM: FUENTES Y PREOCUPACION A LO LARGO DE TRES SIGLOS. III. REVOLUCION, RESTAURACION: LO POLITICO Y LO JURIDICO EN TIEMPOS CONVULSIONADOS IV. SOBERANIA Y PUEBLO ENTRE REPUBLICA Y DICTADURA . V. ESTADO Y ADMINISTRACION: DESINTEGRACION, UNIFICACION, GLOBALIZACION . VI. LECTORES JURISTAS, LECTORES HISTORIADORES: UN BALANCE MIRANDO A LATINOAMERICA. ; Fil: Casagrande, Agustín E. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (UNLP-CONICET); Argentina.

Este ensayo de cultura jurídica utiliza elementos de historia conceptual para analizar la mutación funcional de la Alcaldía de Barrio de Buenos Aires en el período comprendido entre 1770-1820. Partiendo de una crítica al anacronismo de la narrativa policial, se busca, desde una mirada jurisdiccional que servía como modelo de actuación de esa particular institución -la Alcaldía de Barrio-, obturar una mirada estatista que ve en dicha figura una "policía de seguridad". Con dicho fin, y para advertir los principios que guiaban la praxis jurisdiccional de dicha institución, se utilizan de dos conceptos claves: quietud y seguridad pública. Todo ello, tomando en consideración el momento crítico entre las lógicas que gobernaban el ejercicio de un control social, el cual se hallaba tensado entre la justicia a la policía. ; This essay of juridical culture, by using elements of conceptual history, intends to analyze the functional changes of the Alcaldía de Barrio of Buenos Aires, in the period of 1770-1820. Taking as a starting point the anachronism made by the police historiography, which tends to present that institution -the Alcaldía de Barrio- as if it was a "security police" under the paradigm of the State, the article attempts to show the jurisdictional logic that organized the praxis of that political institution. In order to accomplish that, two concepts become essential -Quietness and public security-, and that is because they synthesized different principles which guided the praxis of the officials that proceeded as Alcaldes de Barrio, in a period in which the justice and the police were in constant conflict. ; Fil: Casagrande, Agustín E. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (UNLP-CONICET); Argentina.

Este ensayo de cultura jurídica utiliza elementos de historia conceptual para analizar la mutación funcional de la Alcaldía de Barrio de Buenos Aires en el período comprendido entre 1770-1820. Partiendo de una crítica al anacronismo de la narrativa policial, se busca, desde una mirada jurisdiccional que servía como modelo de actuación de esa particular institución –la Alcaldía de Barrio–, obturar una mirada estatista que ve en dicha figura una "policía de seguridad". Con dicho fin, y para advertir los principios que guiaban la praxis jurisdiccional de dicha institución, se utilizan de dos conceptos claves: quietud y seguridad pública. Todo ello, tomando en consideración el momento crítico entre las lógicas que gobernaban el ejercicio de un control social, el cual se hallaba tensado entre la justicia a la policía. ; This essay of juridical culture, by using elements of conceptual history, intends to analyze the functional changes of the Alcaldía de Barrio of Buenos Aires, in the period of 1770-1820. Taking as a starting point the anachronism made by the police historiography, which tends to present that institution –the Alcaldía de Barrio – as if it was a "security police" under the paradigm of the State, the article attempts to show the jurisdictional logic that organized the praxis of that political institution. In order to accomplish that, two concepts become essential –Quietness and public security–, and that is because they synthesized different principles which guided the praxis of the officials that proceeded as Alcaldes de Barrio, in a period in which the justice and the police were in constant conflict. ; Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación