82 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 24, Heft 5, S. 612-613
ISSN: 1460-3683
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 330-332
ISSN: 1460-3683
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 330-332
ISSN: 1460-3683
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 330-332
ISSN: 1460-3683
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 330-332
ISSN: 1354-0688
In: Women's studies international forum, Band 41, S. 179-186
In: Politics & gender, Band 8, Heft 4, S. 524-529
ISSN: 1743-9248
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 117-119
ISSN: 1460-3683
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 117-119
ISSN: 1354-0688
In: APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: Party politics: an international journal for the study of political parties and political organizations, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 117-119
ISSN: 1460-3683
In: Comparative political studies: CPS, Band 44, Heft 11, S. 1587-1591
ISSN: 1552-3829
In: Comparative political studies: CPS, Band 44, Heft 11, S. 1587-1591
ISSN: 0010-4140
In: Oxford scholarship online
Popular consensus holds that if 'enough women' are present in political institutions they will represent 'women's interests,' however, such generalized assumptions are frequently queried on theoretical grounds and consistently shown to be conditional in practice. In this text, Karen Celis and Sarah Childs address women's poverty of political representation with a feminist account of democratic representation. Celis and Childs rethink and redesign representative institutions, taking ideological and intersectional differences as their starting point.
In: Oxford scholarship online
In: Political Science
Popular consensus holds that if 'enough women' are present in political institutions they will represent 'women's interests,' however, such generalized assumptions are frequently queried on theoretical grounds and consistently shown to be conditional in practice. In this text, Karen Celis and Sarah Childs address women's poverty of political representation with a feminist account of democratic representation. Celis and Childs rethink and redesign representative institutions, taking ideological and intersectional differences as their starting point.