Suchergebnisse

This article starts by looking at the intriguing similarities between the ends of the 19th and 20th centuries as far as the relationships between work and systems or structures of production are concerned. It considers the possible options for representing non-standard (or atypical) workers that can be usefully drawn from the past. Work is termed atypical as compared to the institutionalized forms dominant in the era of Taylorist-Fordist industrial production, although atypical work today has significant precedents in the 19th century. With regard to trade union cultures and policies, the thesis is that only by changing the logic and the practice of bargaining action, drawing inspiration from the theory of the Webbs, can suitable forms of representation be found for those components of non-standard labour more distant from the well-defined, stylized figure of the worker of the industrial age. This is a perspective that can represent both extremes of workers that offer their labour on the market: the highly skilled semi-independent worker, and the contingent worker with generic skills, who is possibly a member of the working poor. This could open the way for a unionism under which few would be excluded from collective representation, even if not 'collective' in the way understood in the past.

The recent waves of privatisation and liberalisation have affected not only forms of economic regulation but also the very nature of citizenship and democracy. It is one thing to privatise a bank or airline; while it is quite another for government to withdraw from directly delivering public welfare services or from the major public utilities. This article analyses the way in which the latest phase of liberalisation and privatisation has transformed the very nature of that citizenship which, in the vision of T. H. Marshall, made it possible to construct a genuine industrial citizenship. To this end we develop the thinking and research which led some to speak of the advent of 'post-democracy'. The argument that the opportunities granted by 'exit' (typical of market choice) are overestimated proves to be the crucial one, especially where the quality of social services are concerned. We therefore revisit Hirschman's well-known 'exit/voice' model before, in the concluding section, making a few proposals as to how a fresh approach could be taken to the problem of choosing between forms of regulation, in which a significant role could be played by 'encompassing' organisations such as major trade union confederations.