Suchergebnisse
Filter
7 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Media accounts and accountability - Examines the ethical can of worms opened by the conflict between the management of media and the practice of journalism
In: AQ: journal of contemporary analysis, Band 72, Heft 1, S. 37-41
ISSN: 0005-0091
Accounts and Accountability
In: AQ: journal of contemporary analysis, Band 72, Heft 1, S. 37
The knowledge lost in information
In: Index on censorship, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 17-23
ISSN: 1746-6067
Australian journalists do battle to prove that while repression may be relative, their desire for free expression is not
The critical factors in producing high quality and policy-relevant research: insights from international behavioural science units
In: Evidence & policy: a journal of research, debate and practice, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 141-162
ISSN: 1744-2656
Background:
There has been a rapid increase in the number of, and demand for, organisations offering behavioural science advice to government over the last ten years. Yet we know little of the state of science and the experiences of these evidence providers.
Aims and objectives:
To identify current practice in this emerging field and the factors that impact on the production of high-quality and policy-relevant research.
Methods:
A qualitative study using one-to-one interviews with representatives from a purposeful sample of 15 units in the vanguard of international behavioural science research in policy. The data were analysed thematically.
Findings:
Relationships with policymakers were important in the inception of units, research conduct, implementation and dissemination of findings. Knowledge exchange facilitated a shared understanding of policy issues/context, and of behavioural science. Sufficient funding was crucial to maintain critical capacity in the units' workforces, build a research portfolio beneficial to policymakers and the units, and to ensure full and transparent dissemination.
Discussion and conclusion:
Findings highlight the positive impact of strong evidence-provider/user relationships and the importance of governments' commitment to co-produced research programmes to address policy problems and transparency in the dissemination of methods and findings. From the findings we have created a framework, 'STEPS' (Sharing, Transparency, Engagement, Partnership, Strong relationships), of five recommendations for units working with policymakers. These findings will be of value to all researchers conducting research on behalf of government.
Optimising physical distancing to reduce the spread of Covid-19: Behavioural science and disease prevention guidance for public health. Taking a Behavioural Science approach
In: Hart , J , Byrne-Davis , L , Epton , T , Ghio , D , Drury , J , Armitage , C , Shorter , G , Arden , M A , Chadwick , P , Kamal , A , Lewis , L , McBride , E , O'Connor , D , Swanson , V , Whittaker , E & Chater , A 2021 , Optimising physical distancing to reduce the spread of Covid-19: Behavioural science and disease prevention guidance for public health. Taking a Behavioural Science approach . British Psychological Society , Leicester .
This guidance offers recommendations for interventions that can be used to encourage and enable physical distancing. The target behaviour for this guidance document is physical distancing, defined as staying 1–2 metres (depending on national guidance)apart from people in the same location. We are using the term 'physical distancing' as opposed to 'social distancing', in line with the World Health Organization and our earlier guidance. Physical distancing is important when viruses are airborne, such as the virus that causes Covid-19. Remaining at a physical distance from others reduces the risk of aerosols and droplets entering the eyes, nose or mouth and therefore reduces the risk of spreading infection, particularly with physical distancing of 1 metre or more3. Many governments and health agencies have recommended people adhere to a physical distance of between1 metre4 to 2 metres5 from people who are not in their household or 'bubble'. In general, people typically stand a little less than 1 metre away from familiar people and 1.3 metre away from others6. Whilst many people have started to physically distance, standing metres away requires breaking strong habits. Even where regulations do not require physical distancing, people might still be encouraged to distance where possible, in regions where transmission rates are rising or high. This guidance is based on a systematic review of the evidence for interventions to encourage physical distancing and summarises the approaches that are effective in helping people to maintain physical distance from others. This included six papers, reporting 14 interventions with over 5500 people. There may be other approaches that could be effective but at present there is no evidence for or against them. It is important to note that some of the evidence reports influences on intention to distance physically rather than the action of physical distancing itself.
BASE
Psychological perspectives on obesity: addressing policy, practice and research priorities
Obesity has received much attention from politicians, policymakers, healthcare professionals, the media and the public over the past few decades. Since the formal recognition from the UK government in 1991 that obesity was a sufficient threat to the health of the nation, a targeted response to address the issue has been a policy priority for almost 30 years. A wide range of policies are now in place, including the establishment of nutritional standards in schools, programmes aimed to boost physical activity, and weight management services. However, while some interventions and services have been successful at the individual and community level, there has been little impact at population level. This report looks at what psychological evidence and perspectives can add to help improve our combined response to obesity. It seeks to guide professionals and policy-makers who are working with individuals, groups and populations that are impacted by obesity to take an approach that is guided by psychology. We have sought to produce guidance that recognises and builds on existing services, while identifying areas where further resources, standards, training and staff are required ; passing metadata only as full text not required and copyright notice prohibits
BASE