Suchergebnisse

International audience ; Background: Improved survival after a cardiovascular event has led to an expanding patient population at very high risk of recurrent events. Reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and thus implicitly non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, to guideline-recommended goals is a key tenet of secondary prevention. Yet, standard-of-care treatment with statin (with or without ezetimibe) often leaves a high risk of preventable cardiovascular events. Inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), highly efficacious lipid-lowering treatments that confer reduction in cardiovascular events and death, clearly have a role in the personalized management of these very-high-risk patients. Given budget constraints, however, their integration into the health care pathway merits health economic considerations. Consequently, it is important to identify challenges at the crossroads of the clinical and economic dimensions.Findings and conclusion: Health economic analyses involve application of modeling scenarios integrating multiple parameters to ultimately yield values for quality-adjusted life-years and cost-effectiveness ratios. To date, these analyses have led to widely variable estimates of these benchmarks for PCSK9 inhibitors, causing confusion among stakeholders in the health care pathway. Clearly, a consensual approach to the conduct and reporting of health economic analyses involving all players, including noneconomists such as clinicians and patient advocates, is essential to bridge the gap between the clinical needs of patients and financial access to PCSK9 inhibition.

International audience ; Background: Improved survival after a cardiovascular event has led to an expanding patient population at very high risk of recurrent events. Reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and thus implicitly non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, to guideline-recommended goals is a key tenet of secondary prevention. Yet, standard-of-care treatment with statin (with or without ezetimibe) often leaves a high risk of preventable cardiovascular events. Inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), highly efficacious lipid-lowering treatments that confer reduction in cardiovascular events and death, clearly have a role in the personalized management of these very-high-risk patients. Given budget constraints, however, their integration into the health care pathway merits health economic considerations. Consequently, it is important to identify challenges at the crossroads of the clinical and economic dimensions.Findings and conclusion: Health economic analyses involve application of modeling scenarios integrating multiple parameters to ultimately yield values for quality-adjusted life-years and cost-effectiveness ratios. To date, these analyses have led to widely variable estimates of these benchmarks for PCSK9 inhibitors, causing confusion among stakeholders in the health care pathway. Clearly, a consensual approach to the conduct and reporting of health economic analyses involving all players, including noneconomists such as clinicians and patient advocates, is essential to bridge the gap between the clinical needs of patients and financial access to PCSK9 inhibition.

International audience ; Background: Improved survival after a cardiovascular event has led to an expanding patient population at very high risk of recurrent events. Reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and thus implicitly non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, to guideline-recommended goals is a key tenet of secondary prevention. Yet, standard-of-care treatment with statin (with or without ezetimibe) often leaves a high risk of preventable cardiovascular events. Inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), highly efficacious lipid-lowering treatments that confer reduction in cardiovascular events and death, clearly have a role in the personalized management of these very-high-risk patients. Given budget constraints, however, their integration into the health care pathway merits health economic considerations. Consequently, it is important to identify challenges at the crossroads of the clinical and economic dimensions.Findings and conclusion: Health economic analyses involve application of modeling scenarios integrating multiple parameters to ultimately yield values for quality-adjusted life-years and cost-effectiveness ratios. To date, these analyses have led to widely variable estimates of these benchmarks for PCSK9 inhibitors, causing confusion among stakeholders in the health care pathway. Clearly, a consensual approach to the conduct and reporting of health economic analyses involving all players, including noneconomists such as clinicians and patient advocates, is essential to bridge the gap between the clinical needs of patients and financial access to PCSK9 inhibition.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to atherosclerosis of the arterial vessel wall and to thrombosis is the foremost cause of premature mortality and of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in Europe, and is also increasingly common in developing countries.1 In the European Union, the economic cost of CVD represents annually E192 billion1 in direct and indirect healthcare costs. The main clinical entities are coronary artery disease (CAD), ischaemic stroke, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The causes of these CVDs are multifactorial. Some of these factors relate to lifestyles, such as tobacco smoking, lack of physical activity, and dietary habits, and are thus modifiable. Other risk factors are also modifiable, such as elevated blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidaemias, or non-modifiable, such as age and male gender. These guidelines deal with the management of dyslipidaemias as an essential and integral part of CVD prevention. Prevention and treatment of dyslipidaemias should always be considered within the broader framework of CVD prevention, which is addressed in guidelines of the Joint European Societies' Task forces on CVD prevention in clinical practice.2 - 5 The latest version of these guidelines was published in 20075; an update will become available in 2012. These Joint ESC/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines on the management of dyslipidaemias are complementary to the guidelines on CVD prevention in clinical practice and address not only physicians [e.g. general practitioners (GPs) and cardiologists] interested in CVD prevention, but also specialists from lipid clinics or metabolic units who are dealing with dyslipidaemias that are more difficult to classify and treat. ; Peer reviewed