Suchergebnisse

The purpose of the article is to analyze the professional and public activities of the well-known Lviv lawyer Kost Pankivskyi in the 1930-ies. Research methodology – principles of science, historicism and objectivity, biographical and prosopographic approaches to the study of life and activity of historical figures, historical-genetic and historical-typological methods, the method of internal critique of sources. Research novelty – for the first time in the historical biography, it has been done a study of the professional and public activity of a well-known Lviv lawyer Kost Pankivskyi in the 1930-ies, which later became a prominent Ukrainian public and political figure, the head of the Government of the Ukrainian National Republic (UNR) in exile. The Conclusions. Thus, since 1930, the lawyer K. Pankivskyi started his own law practice in Lviv. His cases can be divided into three categories: 1) political, 2) corporate, 3) private. In particular, he distinguished himself as a defender of those accused of "political offenses" – participants of the UMO, OUN, KPWU, Komsomol of Western Ukraine. At the same time, K. Pankivskyi was actively involved in the work of the Chamber of lawyers and the Union of Ukrainian Lawyers in Lviv. During his work, he gained a good reputation among colleagues (including Jews and Poles) and clients and was considered one of the best Ukrainian lawyers in Eastern Halychyna (together with S. Shukhevych, S. Fedak, V. Starosolskyi). The prolonged legal practice in the 1930-ies created the personal and public foundation that enabled K. Pankivskyi to prove himself as a public and political figure during the difficult years of the World War II and the post-war period.

The purpose of the article is to analyze the professional and public activities of the well-known Lviv lawyer Kost Pankivskyi in the 1930-ies. Research methodology – principles of science, historicism and objectivity, biographical and prosopographic approaches to the study of life and activity of historical figures, historical-genetic and historical-typological methods, the method of internal critique of sources. Research novelty – for the first time in the historical biography, it has been done a study of the professional and public activity of a well-known Lviv lawyer Kost Pankivskyi in the 1930-ies, which later became a prominent Ukrainian public and political figure, the head of the Government of the Ukrainian National Republic (UNR) in exile. The Conclusions. Thus, since 1930, the lawyer K. Pankivskyi started his own law practice in Lviv. His cases can be divided into three categories: 1) political, 2) corporate, 3) private. In particular, he distinguished himself as a defender of those accused of "political offenses" – participants of the UMO, OUN, KPWU, Komsomol of Western Ukraine. At the same time, K. Pankivskyi was actively involved in the work of the Chamber of lawyers and the Union of Ukrainian Lawyers in Lviv. During his work, he gained a good reputation among colleagues (including Jews and Poles) and clients and was considered one of the best Ukrainian lawyers in Eastern Halychyna (together with S. Shukhevych, S. Fedak, V. Starosolskyi). The prolonged legal practice in the 1930-ies created the personal and public foundation that enabled K. Pankivskyi to prove himself as a public and political figure during the difficult years of the World War II and the post-war period.

The purpose of the article is to analyze the professional and public activities of the well-known Lviv lawyer Kost Pankivskyi in the 1930-ies. Research methodology – principles of science, historicism and objectivity, biographical and prosopographic approaches to the study of life and activity of historical figures, historical-genetic and historical-typological methods, the method of internal critique of sources. Research novelty – for the first time in the historical biography, it has been done a study of the professional and public activity of a well-known Lviv lawyer Kost Pankivskyi in the 1930-ies, which later became a prominent Ukrainian public and political figure, the head of the Government of the Ukrainian National Republic (UNR) in exile. The Conclusions. Thus, since 1930, the lawyer K. Pankivskyi started his own law practice in Lviv. His cases can be divided into three categories: 1) political, 2) corporate, 3) private. In particular, he distinguished himself as a defender of those accused of "political offenses" – participants of the UMO, OUN, KPWU, Komsomol of Western Ukraine. At the same time, K. Pankivskyi was actively involved in the work of the Chamber of lawyers and the Union of Ukrainian Lawyers in Lviv. During his work, he gained a good reputation among colleagues (including Jews and Poles) and clients and was considered one of the best Ukrainian lawyers in Eastern Halychyna (together with S. Shukhevych, S. Fedak, V. Starosolskyi). The prolonged legal practice in the 1930-ies created the personal and public foundation that enabled K. Pankivskyi to prove himself as a public and political figure during the difficult years of the World War II and the post-war period.

The purpose of the investigation is to determine the components of Ukraine's national security support system and the nature of its implementation in the context of current events in the country. As the main content of the investigation, it has carried out a comprehensive analysis of the state of national security in Ukraine, its system, main tasks, and structural elements. In addition, it has examined the state of realization of Ukraine's national security in the context of modern developments in the state. Methodologically, the documentary research technique was used since the main sources of the study were documentary. The basis is the dialectical method of knowledge of the facts of social reality, on which comparative formal and legal approaches are largely based. The main organs that guarantee the national security of the state include the country's Armed Forces and all state power structures who have as their main task assigned by the state: to guarantee the highest possible level of protection of the nation together with its strategic interests.