Suchergebnisse

The paper deals with the analysis of the legal nature of international courts' decisions and their impact on the international financial legal order. The author claims that decisions of international courts, creating no new international legal financial norms, act as an additional source of international financial law, having no autonomy, and in combination with other sources of international law, performs the following functions: 1) regulatory-prescriptive (via opinio juris of existing traditions in interstate practice in the financial sphere transforming them into international customary law); 2) regulatory-affirming (confirming the legal nature of the international agreement between the subjects of international financial legal relations which caused a disputable situation). The judicial practice on financial issues and specificity of functioning of such judicial institutions as the Permanent Court of International Justice, the International Court of Justice, the CIS Economic Court, the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Court of Justice of the Central African Economic and Monetary Community, etc. are examined. The features of the provisions of international agreements on financial issues regarding the procedure for resolving disputes between the parties of the agreement about its implementation are analyzed. The paper explores particularities of the origin and development of the idea of the creation of an international financial court. Amid modern processes of the rapid growth of the amount of crossborder financial flows in the context of globalization, which is the consequence of the implementation of numerous international financial agreements, the idea of creation of an international financial court, which was first suggested in 1935, due to the complexity of legal nature of interstate financial disputes, is an objective necessity. The following features intrinsic to decisions of international courts (including decisions on financial issues) have been identified: 1) locality (binding only on the ...

The paper deals with the analysis of the legal nature of international courts' decisions and their impact on the international financial legal order. The author claims that decisions of international courts, creating no new international legal financial norms, act as an additional source of international financial law, having no autonomy, and in combination with other sources of international law, performs the following functions: 1) regulatory-prescriptive (via opinio juris of existing traditions in interstate practice in the financial sphere transforming them into international customary law); 2) regulatory-affirming (confirming the legal nature of the international agreement between the subjects of international financial legal relations which caused a disputable situation).
The judicial practice on financial issues and specificity of functioning of such judicial institutions as the Permanent Court of International Justice, the International Court of Justice, the CIS Economic Court, the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Court of Justice of the Central African Economic and Monetary Community, etc. are examined. The features of the provisions of international agreements on financial issues regarding the procedure for resolving disputes between the parties of the agreement about its implementation are analyzed.
The paper explores particularities of the origin and development of the idea of the creation of an international financial court. Amid modern processes of the rapid growth of the amount of cross-border financial flows in the context of globalization, which is the consequence of the implementation of numerous international financial agreements, the idea of creation of an international financial court, which was first suggested in 1935, due to the complexity of legal nature of interstate financial disputes, is an objective necessity.
The following features intrinsic to decisions of international courts (including decisions on financial issues) have been identified: 1) locality (binding only on the parties involved in the case, and only in the current case); 2) situatedness and unprompted appearance; 3) impartiality (due to the judges' lack of political interest); 4) authority (international courts include generally recognized experts in international law).

The paper deals with the analysis of the legal nature of international courts' decisions and their impact on the international financial legal order. The author claims that decisions of international courts, creating no new international legal financial norms, act as an additional source of international financial law, having no autonomy, and in combination with other sources of international law, performs the following functions: 1) regulatory-prescriptive (via opinio juris of existing traditions in interstate practice in the financial sphere transforming them into international customary law); 2) regulatory-affirming (confirming the legal nature of the international agreement between the subjects of international financial legal relations which caused a disputable situation). The judicial practice on financial issues and specificity of functioning of such judicial institutions as the Permanent Court of International Justice, the International Court of Justice, the CIS Economic Court, the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Court of Justice of the Central African Economic and Monetary Community, etc. are examined. The features of the provisions of international agreements on financial issues regarding the procedure for resolving disputes between the parties of the agreement about its implementation are analyzed. The paper explores particularities of the origin and development of the idea of the creation of an international financial court. Amid modern processes of the rapid growth of the amount of cross-border financial flows in the context of globalization, which is the consequence of the implementation of numerous international financial agreements, the idea of creation of an international financial court, which was first suggested in 1935, due to the complexity of legal nature of interstate financial disputes, is an objective necessity. The following features intrinsic to decisions of international courts (including decisions on financial issues) have been identified: 1) locality (binding only on the parties involved in the case, and only in the current case); 2) situatedness and unprompted appearance; 3) impartiality (due to the judges' lack of political interest); 4) authority (international courts include generally recognized experts in international law). ; Анализируются правовая природа решений международных судов и их влияние на международный финансовый правопорядок. Отмечается, что решения международных судов, не создавая новых международно-правовых норм, выступают как дополнительный источник международного финансового права, который в сочетании с другими источниками международного права выполняет следующие функции: 1) нормативно-устанавливающую (путем opiniojuris существующих обычаев в межгосударственной практике в финансовой сфере трансформирует их в международно-правовые обычные нормы); 2) нормативно-подтверждающую (подтверждает правовую норму международного соглашения между субъектами международных финансовых отношений, по поводу которой возникла спорная ситуация). Рассмотрено практику международных судов в финансовой сфере. Определены следующие признаки, присущие решениям международных судов (включая решения по финансовым вопросах): 1) локальность (обязательность только для сторон, которые берут участие в конкретном судебном деле); 2) ситуативность и незапланированость появления; 3) беспристрастность (в силу отсутствия политического интереса у судей); 4) авторитетность (в состав международных судов входят признанные специалисты по международному праву). ; Проаналізовано правову природу рішень міжнародних судів та їх вплив на міжнародний фінансовий правопорядок. Рішення міжнародних судів, не створюючи нових міжнародно-правових фінансових норм, виступають як додаткове джерело міжнародного фінансового права, яке, не володіючи самостійністю, в поєднанні з іншими джерелами міжнародного права виконує нормативно-встановну (шляхом opiniojuris існуючих звичаїв у міждержавній практиці у фінансовій сфері трансформує їх у міжнародно-правові звичаєві норми) та нормативно-підтверджувальну функції (підтверджує правову норму міжнародної угоди між суб'єктами міжнародних фінансових правовідносин, з приводу якої виникла спірна ситуація). Розглянуто практику міжнародних судів у фінансовій сфері. Визначено такі ознаки, притаманні рішенням міжнародних судів (включаючи рішення з фінансових питань): 1) локальність (обов'язковість тільки для сторін, які беруть участь у конкретній справі); 2) ситуативність і незапланованість появи; 3) неупередженість (в силу відсутності політичного інтересу у суддів); 4) авторитетність (до складу міжнародних судів входять загальновизнані фахівці з міжнародного права).