Suchergebnisse

El fracaso reiterado de las medidas adoptadas por la Unión Europea
(UE) en el ámbito migratorio ha sido el detonante para proponer un enfoque
renovado en esta materia, a través de un paquete normativo derivado del Nuevo
Pacto sobre Migración y Asilo. Por un lado, la gestión de la política migratoria europea
adopta un concepto más flexible que integra otras formas de solidaridad
para aquellos Estados que no quieren acoger a personas migrantes. Por otro, se
continúa apostando por la seguridad como eje fundamental de las relaciones con
terceros países, soslayando la posible vulneración de los derechos humanos al
negociar con regímenes no democráticos. Desde una metodología cualitativa,
analizamos estos dos pilares para averiguar si el enfoque responde realmente a
los desafíos del continente, que van desde la gestión de los flujos, pasando por la
acogida e integración, hasta el reto de contrarrestar el envejecimiento demográfico
y social de nuestras sociedades.
Europar Batasunak (EB) migrazioaren arloan hartu dituen neurriek
behin eta berriro egin dute porrot. Hori dela eta, gaiaren inguruko beste
ikuspegi bat proposatu dute, migrazioari eta asiloari buruzko itun berriaren ondoriozko
arau-zorro baten bidez. Batetik, Europako migrazio-politikaren kudeaketak
kontzeptu malguago bati heldu dio, eta bestelako elkartasun-moduak txertatu dira
migratzailerik hartu nahi ez duten estatuetarako. Bestetik, apustuak jarraitzen du
izaten segurtasunaren aldekoa, hirugarren herrialdeekiko harremanen oinarrizko
ardatz gisa; horrela, saihestu egiten da erregimen ez-demokratikoekiko negoziazioetan
giza eskubideak urratzeko aukera. Metodologia kualitatiboa erabilita, bi
zutabe horiek aztertuko ditugu, ikuspegi berriak kontinentearen erronkei benetan
erantzuten ote dien ikusteko. Erronka horien artean ditugu, besteak beste, fluxuen
kudeaketa, harrera eta integrazioa eta gure gizarteen zahartze demografiko eta sozialari
aurre egiteko desafioa.
The repeated failure of the measures adopted by the EU in the
area of migration has been the trigger for proposing a renewed approach on this
field, through a regulatory package derived from the New Pact on Migration and
Asylum. On the one hand, the management of European migration policy adopts
a more flexible concept, that integrates other forms of solidarity for those States
that do not wish to receive migrants. On the other hand, it continues to focus on
security as the cornerstone of relations with third countries, ignoring the possible
violation of human rights when negotiating with non-democratic regimes. Using
a qualitative methodology, we analyze these two pillars to find out if the approach
really responds to the continent¿s challenges, which range from the management
of flows, through reception and integration, to the challenge of counteracting the
demographic and social aging of our societies.

The European policy of development cooperation falls within the framework of the principlesand objectives of the external action of the Union, without shifting the responsibility of MemberStates in this area, but the Union and Member States cooperation policies for the development thatcomplement and reinforce each other.
Thus, the EU not only faces the challenge of Policy Coherence for Development in the horizontal plane, when their decisions concerning other jurisdictional areas that may affect partner countries, but also in the vertical plane, when it comes to coordinating their work with Member States and international organizations.
Being solidarity one of the values on which the European Union is founded, the European regional framework becomes the most suitable level to increase the effectiveness of European aid, assuming responsibility for coordination and management of policy coherence.