Our critical epistemic review examines how researchers deal with the creation of knowledge regarding learning in organizations from the standpoint of cognitive interests. We adopted the epistemic matrices' analytical model elaborated by Paes de Paula (2016), who handles the creation of knowledge based on cognitive interests and epistemic reconstruction, as an alternative to the paradigms of Burrel and Morgan (1979). The object of analysis were dissertations defended in Brazilian stricto sensu graduate programs in Administration. The identification of cognitive interests in the dissertations was based on sociological approaches classified by the circle of epistemic matrices, which encompasses pure sociological approaches and sets of overlapping closed curves, forming hybrid sociological approaches. The latent and clear content of sociological approaches were collected and analyzed using the qualitative data analysis software Atlas.ti 7. We conclude that the technical and practical interests guide the creation of knowledge regarding learning in organizations – putting aside the emancipatory interest in our discussions. We also conclude that, in order to make contributions for the advancement of knowledge, our study must go beyond the aggregation of cognitive interests; it is necessary to investigate the postulates of sociological approaches to which the interests are connected.
A pesquisa busca identificar se existe associação entre propensão ao gerenciamento de resultados e os atributos de estrutura de propriedade nas sociedades de capital aberto no Brasil. O gerenciamento de resultados foi estimado pelas medidas propostas por Leuz, Nanda e Wysocki (2003) e Zimmerman e Gontcharov (2003). As características de estrutura de propriedade dizem respeito ao controle da firma, à composição acionária, à participação em listagens em bolsas e em níveis de governança, além de aspectos de negociação de ações. Considerou-se o período de 1998 a 2010. Os dados para mensuração das variáveis foram obtidos na base de dados Economática®, nos Formulários de Referência de Informações Anuais e nas Demonstrações Financeiras Padronizadas disponíveis nos portais institucionais da BM&FBovespa e da CVM. As inferências empíricas tiveram como bases estatísticas descritivas, análise de correlação e análise de regressão múltipla. Os achados forneceram subsídios para não se rejeitar integralmente a hipótese de que o nível de gerenciamento de resultados contábeis nas sociedades de capital aberto do Brasil pode ser significantemente afetado por características de sua estrutura de propriedade.
A pesquisa investigou se a evidenciação em relatórios contábeis de informações sobre risco e sobre sua gestão afeta, na margem, a avaliação de firmas no mercado de capitais brasileiro. Questionou-se a existência de value-relevance do disclosure de informações relativas a fatores de risco e a estruturas de gestão de riscos. A importância do tema emerge da documentação de que o disclosure sobre os fatores de risco exerce papel estatisticamente significante na avaliação de firmas em contexto marcado por incerteza econômica e política, caso do mercado brasileiro. Os achados confirmaram que informações sobre o risco mostram relevância informacional para a avaliação das firmas. As informações sobre gestão de risco na firma, por seu turno, não se mostraram significantes para afetar a avaliação das ações das empresas. A investigação sobre o reporte detalhado de distintos fatores de risco apontou que informações individualizadas mostram graus diversos de relevância para avaliação das firmas. Infere-se que a evidenciação de fatores de risco afeta a percepção dos investidores, os quais suportam suas estimativas de retorno também com base na disponibilização e no detalhamento de tais informações. Observou-se, ainda, que a informação sobre estrutura de gestão de riscos não se mostrou value-relevant; ademais, poucas firmas publicaram informações sobre a constituição desse tipo de órgão na estrutura administrativa. Recorreu-se à aplicação do modelo residual income valuation (RIV) (Ohlson, 1995) por meio de regressões com estimação por dados em painel referentes ao triênio 2012-2014. A amostra, delimitada aleatoriamente, foi constituída por 100 empresas. Os dados sobre evidenciação de risco e evidenciação da gestão de risco foram coletados nos Formulários de Referência das empresas, disponíveis no website da Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros de São Paulo (BM&FBOVESPA). Espera-se, como impacto à área de conhecimento, maior amplitude nas discussões sobre a utilidade da divulgação sobre o tema referente a fatores de risco e a existência de órgão específico responsável pela gestão de risco nas firmas, segundo a percepção de investidores. Contribui-se, ainda, trazendo evidências sobre a qualidade de disclosure relativo a risco (fatores e gestão) e a percepção do mercado de capitais quanto à informatividade e à relevância de tais destaques. ; This study investigated whether the disclosure in accounting reports of information on risk and its management affects, at the margin, firm valuations in the Brazilian capital market. It questioned the existence of value relevance in the disclosure of information related to risk factors and risk management structures. The importance of the topic arises from the documentation that disclosure on risk factors plays a statistically significant role in valuing firms in a context marked by economic and political uncertainty, as is the case of the Brazilian market. The findings confirmed that information about risk shows informational relevance for firm valuations. Information on risk management in a firm, in turn, was not shown to be significant in terms of affecting company share valuations. The investigation of detailed reports with different risk factors indicated that individualized information shows different degrees of relevance for company valuations. It is inferred that the disclosure of risk factors affects the perception of investors, who also base their estimates of return on the availability and detail of such information. It is also observed that information on risk management structure was not shown to be value relevant; moreover, few firms published information on the establishment of this type of entity in their management structures. The residual income valuation (RIV) model (Ohlson, 1995) was applied using regressions with panel data estimation related to the three years covering 2012 to 2014. The sample, which was randomly delimited, was formed of 100 companies. The data on disclosure of risk and disclosure of risk management were collected from the companies' Reference Forms, available from the website of the São Paulo Stock, Commodities, and Futures Exchange (BM&FBOVESPA). As an impact on the area of knowledge, broader discussions are expected regarding the utility of disclosure on the topic related to risk factors and the existence of a specific body responsible for risk management in firms, according to investors' perceptions. It also contributes by providing evidence about the quality of disclosure related to risk (factors and management) and the perception of the capital market regarding the informativeness and relevance of such elements.
ABSTRACT This study investigated whether the disclosure in accounting reports of information on risk and its management affects, at the margin, firm valuations in the Brazilian capital market. It questioned the existence of value relevance in the disclosure of information related to risk factors and risk management structures. The importance of the topic arises from the documentation that disclosure on risk factors plays a statistically significant role in valuing firms in a context marked by economic and political uncertainty, as is the case of the Brazilian market. The findings confirmed that information about risk shows informational relevance for firm valuations. Information on risk management in a firm, in turn, was not shown to be significant in terms of affecting company share valuations. The investigation of detailed reports with different risk factors indicated that individualized information shows different degrees of relevance for company valuations. It is inferred that the disclosure of risk factors affects the perception of investors, who also base their estimates of return on the availability and detail of such information. It is also observed that information on risk management structure was not shown to be value relevant; moreover, few firms published information on the establishment of this type of entity in their management structures. The residual income valuation (RIV) model (Ohlson, 1995) was applied using regressions with panel data estimation related to the three years covering 2012 to 2014. The sample, which was randomly delimited, was formed of 100 companies. The data on disclosure of risk and disclosure of risk management were collected from the companies' Reference Forms, available from the website of the São Paulo Stock, Commodities, and Futures Exchange (BM&FBOVESPA). As an impact on the area of knowledge, broader discussions are expected regarding the utility of disclosure on the topic related to risk factors and the existence of a specific body responsible for risk management in firms, according to investors' perceptions. It also contributes by providing evidence about the quality of disclosure related to risk (factors and management) and the perception of the capital market regarding the informativeness and relevance of such elements.
ABSTRACT This study investigated whether the disclosure in accounting reports of information on risk and its management affects, at the margin, firm valuations in the Brazilian capital market. It questioned the existence of value relevance in the disclosure of information related to risk factors and risk management structures. The importance of the topic arises from the documentation that disclosure on risk factors plays a statistically significant role in valuing firms in a context marked by economic and political uncertainty, as is the case of the Brazilian market. The findings confirmed that information about risk shows informational relevance for firm valuations. Information on risk management in a firm, in turn, was not shown to be significant in terms of affecting company share valuations. The investigation of detailed reports with different risk factors indicated that individualized information shows different degrees of relevance for company valuations. It is inferred that the disclosure of risk factors affects the perception of investors, who also base their estimates of return on the availability and detail of such information. It is also observed that information on risk management structure was not shown to be value relevant; moreover, few firms published information on the establishment of this type of entity in their management structures. The residual income valuation (RIV) model (Ohlson, 1995) was applied using regressions with panel data estimation related to the three years covering 2012 to 2014. The sample, which was randomly delimited, was formed of 100 companies. The data on disclosure of risk and disclosure of risk management were collected from the companies' Reference Forms, available from the website of the São Paulo Stock, Commodities, and Futures Exchange (BM&FBOVESPA). As an impact on the area of knowledge, broader discussions are expected regarding the utility of disclosure on the topic related to risk factors and the existence of a specific body responsible for risk management in firms, according to investors' perceptions. It also contributes by providing evidence about the quality of disclosure related to risk (factors and management) and the perception of the capital market regarding the informativeness and relevance of such elements.
O objetivo da pesquisa consiste em analisar se efeitos decorrentes de estrutura de propriedade concentrada predominam na forma de entrincheiramento ou de alinhamento para o atributo de informatividade do lucro, condicionado à presença de padrão contábil baseado em princípios. Foi utilizada amostra de empresas listadas na BM&FBovespa considerando o período de 2008 a 2014. Sarlo Neto et al. (2010) exploraram o tema em pesquisa similar, que fundamenta e se compara neste estudo. Aplicaram-se modelos baseados em Easton e Harris (1991) associando informatividade com concentração de votos em posse do maior acionista e indicador de divergência entre direitos do maior acionista (fluxo de caixa e voto). Os dados foram coletados nos sistemas Economática® e SInC® e processados por regressões com estimação com dados em painel. Sob a hipótese de interferência dos efeitos estudados na informatividade dos lucros, evidenciou-se que há: persistência do coeficiente lucro/retorno indicando significante informatividade dos lucros e influência do efeito entrincheiramento na informatividade, não se rejeitando a hipótese. Ademais, a informatividade apresentou-se mais efetiva na vigência do padrão contábil IFRS.
O artigo examina as diferenças, em termos de qualidade informacional (conservadorismo condicional), das demonstrações contábeis de companhias brasileiras de capital aberto emissoras e não emissoras de ADR. Também são examinadas as demonstrações publicadas nos dois sistemas contábeis (PCAB e USGAAP). As hipóteses propõem que não há diferenças nos graus de conservadorismo condicional entre as firmas em razão das similaridades contratuais e institucionais, da inexistência de incentivos para alterar o comportamento dos gestores pelo processo de cross-listing e da insuficiência de motivação pela aplicação de princípios contábeis diversos. Os modelos de componentes transitórios nos lucros (BASU, 1997) e de associação entre apropriações contábeis e fluxos de caixa (BALL; SHIVAKUMAR, 2005) foram utilizados para os testes. Para estimar os coeficientes de associação dos dois modelos, utilizou-se análise de dados em painel. Os resultados confirmaram as hipóteses.
