Socialness and the Undersocialized Conception of Society
In: Science, technology, & human values: ST&HV, Band 23, Heft 4, S. 494-516
ISSN: 1552-8251
7 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Science, technology, & human values: ST&HV, Band 23, Heft 4, S. 494-516
ISSN: 1552-8251
In: Science, technology, & human values: ST&HV, Band 17, Heft 3, S. 406-406
ISSN: 1552-8251
In: Science, technology, & human values: ST&HV, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 249-251
ISSN: 1552-8251
In: Philosophy of the social sciences: an international journal = Philosophie des sciences sociales, Band 15, Heft 3, S. 377-380
ISSN: 1552-7441
In: Science, technology, & human values: ST&HV, Band 23, Heft 4, S. 371-383
ISSN: 1552-8251
In: Science, technology, & human values: ST&HV, Band 16, Heft 3, S. 322-341
ISSN: 1552-8251
Peer review of grant applications, it has been suggested, might be distorted by what is popularly termed old boyism, cronyism, or particularism. We argue that the existing debate emphasizes the more uninteresting aspects of the peer review system and that the operation of old boyism, as currently understood would have little effect on the overall direction of science. We identify a phenomenon of cognitive particularism, which we consider to be more important than the institutional cronyism analyzed in previous studies. We illustrate with material drawn from observation of grant-awarding commit tees of the (British) Science and Engineering Research CounciL In the concluding discussion, we explore some of the possible implications for the peer review system.
In: Science, technology, & human values: ST&HV, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 267-285
ISSN: 1552-8251
Humans do two types of actions, polimorphic actions and mimeomorphic actions. The ability to carry out polimorphic actions cannot be mastered outside of socialization. Mimeomorphic actions, however, can be learned in other ways; sometimes, they can be learned away from the context of practice. Polimorphic actions cannot be mimicked by machines, but some mimeomorphic actions can. Other mimeomorphic actions are too complex to mechanize. Actions that cannot be mechanized because they are physically complicated should not be confused with actions that cannot be mechanized because socialization is needed to master them. The analysis has implications for recent debates concerning the differences and similarities between humans and machines. The implica tion of the analysis is that much more can be understood about the relationship between humans and machines if the difference is treated as being a consequence of the unique properties of human societies. In this article, the analysis is applied to cardiac catheteriza tion, pacemaker implantation, simulation of bodies, and work in a medical "SkillsLab."