Verification and compliance
In: Disarmament: a periodic review by the United Nations, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 155-174
ISSN: 0251-9518
13 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Disarmament: a periodic review by the United Nations, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 155-174
ISSN: 0251-9518
World Affairs Online
In: Disarmament: a periodic review by the United Nations, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 107-112
ISSN: 0251-9518
World Affairs Online
In: Disarmament: the Human Factor, S. 131-135
In: Bulletin of peace proposals: to motivate research, to inspire future oriented thinking, to promote activities for peace, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 211-220
ISSN: 2516-9181
In: International journal / Canadian Institute of International Affairs, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 292-308
ISSN: 2052-465X
In: International journal / Canadian Institute of International Affairs, Band 35, Heft 2, S. 292-308
ISSN: 0020-7020
World Affairs Online
In: The bulletin of the atomic scientists: a magazine of science and public affairs, Band 34, Heft 4, S. 14-17
ISSN: 0096-3402, 0096-5243, 0742-3829
World Affairs Online
In: American political science review, Band 48, Heft 4, S. 1067-1082
ISSN: 1537-5943
Who handles American foreign relations?The question has been answered and discussed in terms of the Executive and the Congress in several recent books. We shall attempt here to answer the question in terms of the people who occupy the higher, or policy-making, positions in the Department of State and Foreign Service. Biographical data is published for individuals in this group in the Biographic Register of the Department of State and its supplements.This type of "Who's Who" sketch is limited, of course, to the bare skeletons of men's lives and is worthless as a test of faith and gumption. One of the tragedies, indeed, in the public service since the loyalty program began in 1947 is the fact that loyalty and security risk cannot be proved by social analysis in a time when loyalty and safeness in matters of security are the great questions that overshadow other concerns in any consideration of public personnel. Of the main reasons for finding an employee a poor security risk—wrong political association, bad character, sexual deviation, excessive drinking, or talking too much—none can be measured by any objective standard. Guilt is a matter of degree, and the degree is a matter of opinion among security officers and others who are urged by their climate to be as suspicious as possible.
In: American political science review, Band 48, S. 1067-1082
ISSN: 0003-0554
In: Disarmament: a periodic review by the United Nations, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 113-156
ISSN: 0251-9518
World Affairs Online
World Affairs Online
In: Disarmament: a periodic review by the United Nations, Band 8, Heft 1, S. 9-107
ISSN: 0251-9518
World Affairs Online
In: Bulletin of peace proposals: to motivate research, to inspire future oriented thinking, to promote activities for peace
ISSN: 0007-5035
World Affairs Online