Search results

In theory, republican orthodoxy does not acknowledge the political dignity of any intermediary body between free and equal individuals, stripped of all particularism, and the sovereign nation. This is why, right up to the present, the French public debate has been marked by an entrenched suspicion towards all forms of «communitarism», and by the proscription of the very concept of multicultural politics. But have the policies actually pursued by republican France been consistent with the proclaimed principles? Is it genuinely possible to claim that cultural identities have never been publicly «recognised»? This multidisciplinary investigation proposes to address the ambiguous relations between theory and practice in the Republican management of cultural pluralism

In theory, republican orthodoxy does not acknowledge the political dignity of any intermediary body between free and equal individuals, stripped of all particularism, and the sovereign nation. This is why, right up to the present, the French public debate has been marked by an entrenched suspicion towards all forms of «communitarism», and by the proscription of the very concept of multicultural politics. But have the policies actually pursued by republican France been consistent with the proclaimed principles? Is it genuinely possible to claim that cultural identities have never been publicly «recognised»? This multidisciplinary investigation proposes to address the ambiguous relations between theory and practice in the Republican management of cultural pluralism. - L'ortodossia repubblicana non riconosce teoricamente dignità politica ad alcun corpo intermedio tra gli individui liberi, eguali e spogliati di ogni particolarismo, e la nazione sovrana. È per questo che sino al giorno d'oggi, la discussione pubblica francese è segnata da un radicato sospetto nei confronti di ogni «comunitarismo», e dalla proscrizione del concetto stesso di politica multiculturale. Ma le politiche concretamente seguite dalla Francia repubblicana sono state coerenti con i principi proclamati? Ed è davvero possibile affermare che le identità culturali non siano mai state pubblicamente «riconosciute»? Attraverso un'indagine pluridisciplinare, ci si propone di indagare l'ambigua relazione esistente tra la teoria e la pratica nella gestione repubblicana della pluralità culturale.

In theory, republican orthodoxy does not acknowledge the political dignity of any intermediary body between free and equal individuals, stripped of all particularism, and the sovereign nation. This is why, right up to the present, the French public debate has been marked by an entrenched suspicion towards all forms of "communitarism", and by the proscription of the very concept of multicultural politics. But have the policies actually pursued by republican France been consistent with the proclaimed principles? Is it genuinely possible to claim that cultural identities have never been publicly "recognised"? This multidisciplinary investigation proposes to address the ambiguous relations between theory and practice in the Republican management of cultural pluralism.

Il termineha cominciato a essere impiegato nel nostro paese con riferimento all'integrazione sociale di gruppi minoritari solo a partire dagli anni sessanta, per sostituire il concetto ormai logoro di. Prendendo in esame le piů recenti normative italiane ed europee l'articolo mostra come le nuove politiche disegnino un ritorno, al di sotto di una terminologia rimasta immutata, alla concettualitÀ assimilazionista. Questo ritorno, in controtendenza rispetto alla progressiva giuridificazione e proceduralizzazione dell'appartenenza messa in moto dall'emergere nel secondo dopoguerra della politica dei diritti umani, sembra spingere le nostre societÀ politiche indietro verso una pericolosa ri-sostanzializzazione del concetto di cittadinanza in un processo che, lungi dall'aprire spazi di convivenza culturalmente plurali, sembra condurre concretamente verso una sempre piů spregiudicata e discriminante selezione migratoria funzionale a perpetuare quella sistematica inferiorizzazione economica e simbolica degli immigrati in cui consiste e di cui si nutre il razzismo istituzionale europeo.

In theory, republican orthodoxy does not acknowledge the political dignity of any intermediary body between free and equal individuals, stripped of all particularism, and the sovereign nation. This is why, right up to the present, the French public debate has been marked by an entrenched suspicion towards all forms of «communitarism», and by the proscription of the very concept of multicultural politics. But have the policies actually pursued by republican France been consistent with the proclaimed principles? Is it genuinely possible to claim that cultural identities have never been publicly «recognised»? This multidisciplinary investigation proposes to address the ambiguous relations between theory and practice in the Republican management of cultural pluralism.

In this paper we analyse how Italy and Slovakia have dealt in practice with the idea of religious pluralism and what legal instruments they have used to ensure it. The history of state-church relationships in Slovakia has been full of abrupt changes due to political changes; in Italy the development has been more straightforward, but in both countries the Catholic Church has had a privileged position. We offer a few suggestions for how today's increasing religious plurality might be handled in a more transparent and just way, using a rather different legal and institutional framework and thus promoting real religious pluralism.