Search results

AbstractIn Italy, the Five Star Movement (M5S) and the Northern League (LN) formed a coalition government after the legislative elections of March 2018. What has been the actual impact of the populist executive in the Italian foreign policy? Relying on the (few) existing analyses that have developed specific hypotheses on the expected internationalrepercussions of populist parties-ruled governments, the paper examines Italy's foreign policy under the Italian "Yellow–Green" cabinet (June 2018–August 2019). The manuscript advances three hypotheses. First, the foreign policy of the Conte's government has been featured by a personalistic and a centralized decision-making process. Second, the Yellow-Green executive has adopted a vocal confrontational stance on the world stage, especially within multilateral frameworks, to "take back control" over national sovereignty. Third, such sovereignist foreign policy was largely symbolic because of "strategic" populist attitudes toward public opinion and due to domestic and international constraints. The manuscript—which is based on secondary and primary sources, such as interviews with former ministers, MPs, and diplomats—aims at offering a new perspective on populist parties and foreign policy, alimenting the rising debate on foreign policy change.

The literature on strategic narratives has started to pay growing attention to the concept of "narrative dominance," stressing the role played by counternarratives in hindering a wider acceptance of a specific message. However, limited consideration has been devoted to counternarratives, which have seldom been assessed in a systematic way. The aim of this article is to fill these gaps by examining the underrated case of Italy. The article investigates the main content of narratives and counternarratives developed by parties and peace movements regarding the decision to acquire the F-35. The article, which is based on primary and secondary sources, adopts a multidisciplinary approach, combining security studies and social movement studies.

Public attitudes are greatly shaped by the cohesiveness of the strategic narratives crafted by policy-makers in framing the national involvement in war. The literature has recently devoted growing attention toward the features that define successful strategic narratives, such as a consistent set of objectives, convincing cause–effect chains, as well as credible promises of success. This paper provides an original framework for 'effective strategic narratives' for the case of Italy. The military operations undertaken by Italian armed forces in Iraq, Lebanon, and Libya represent the cases through which the framework is assessed. Drawing on content and discourse analysis of political debates and data provided by public opinion surveys, this paper explores the nature of the strategic narratives and their effectiveness.

Le Forze armate italiane sono da anni impiegate nel contesto internazionale per affrontare quelle che sono percepite e definite quali "nuove minacce", non puramente militari. In una concezione multidimensionale della sicurezza nazionale, fenomeni quali immigrazione clandestina, terrorismo internazionale, criminalità organizzata, pirateria, "stati falliti", crisi regionali e disastri ambientali sono stati affrontati facendo ricorso anche allo strumento militare. Nello scenario post-bipolare le minacce alla sicurezza nazionale non provengono principalmente da attori statuali e da Forze armate regolari. Non è più prioritario garantire la difesa dei confini nazionali come avveniva durante la Guerra fredda. Pertanto si è passati da una concezione statica dello strumento militare a una modalità dinamica di continua proiezione esterna delle forze, tesa a garantire la stabilità in aree di crisi, dalle quali possono emergere nuove e complesse sfide per la sicurezza nazionale.

A significant engagement in military missions is probably the most distinctive feature of post-Cold War Italian foreign policy. In the last three decades, Italy has participated in an extensive number of operations across the world, including those in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya. Several studies have described Italian troop deployments abroad, providing alternative explanations of the Italian military activism. However, despite a recent growing attention on the topic, mainly focusing on specific peacekeeping operations, a comprehensive investigation of the evolution of Italian interventions is still missing. In other words, a detailed picture of main trends, data and patterns – since the end of the Second World War – is lacking. This article aims to fill this gap, using the most detailed and complete data on Italy's participation in peace and security operations to date. We show that Italian involvement steadily grew between 1990 and 2010 and decreased in the following ten years. Our empirical findings also indicate how Italy's efforts were increasingly directed in the Mediterranean and North Africa region in recent years. The article contributes to the existing literature on military operations abroad by offering a broad quantitative perspective on the post-Cold War defence policy of a 'middle power'.

A growing body of the International Relations (IR) literature has started to pay attention to the concept of 'strategic narratives', stressing the role played by storylines in affecting public attitudes. However, the analytical differences between concepts like strategic narratives, master narratives, frames, framing and master frames have been rarely investigated through a comprehensive approach. Very different definitions and perspectives have been adopted in the IR scholarly debate and beyond, while few studies have identified how ideologies underlie frames and narratives. This article aims at filling this gap and makes two claims. First, the process of plot formation, their strategic dimension and the levels at which narratives operate are the special features that distinguish strategic narratives from all other concepts. Second, only by unpacking – from an interdisciplinary perspective – the complex relation between ideology and narratives can we understand the proper conceptual boundaries in the narrative literature. In sum, there are four levels of discourse to be considered: frame, strategic narrative, master narrative and ideology.

The role of political parties in foreign policy is gaining increasing attention. Nonetheless, despite an extraordinary interest in 'populism', the foreign policy of populist parties has rarely been investigated. This article provides an innovative theoretical framework, applying it on a rare example of a 'pure' populist party: Italy's Five Star Movement. How has Five Star Movement positioned on Italian contribution to military operations abroad? What does such positioning say about its ideological leaning? In order to address such questions, the article analyses Five Star Movement's MPs' votes and speeches on foreign policy during its first term in Parliament (2013–2018). We find that, notwithstanding some ambiguities, the Movement's stance has been mostly pacifist and humanitarian, resembling more a 'left-libertarian populist party' than a 'sovereigntist far-right one'. Through these findings, the article contributes to the debate on populist parties and foreign policy in Europe, clarifying also the elusive ideological leaning of the Five Star Movement.

l fenomeno dei cosiddetti foreign fighters illustra la crescente importanza degli attori transnazionali nella politica internazionale contemporanea. In seguito ai sempre più frequenti attacchi in paesi occidentali – da Parigi a Manchester – la potenziale minaccia rappresentata da questi combattenti è sempre più al centro del dibattito pubblico. Nonostante questo generale interesse, scarsa attenzione è stata finora dedicata alla dimensione "militare" del fenomeno, come la modalità di addestramento dei combattenti o la loro capacità adattamento sul campo ai diversi scenari. Osservando il caso di ISIL (Stato Islamico dell'Iraq e del Levante), questo capitolo avanzerà alcuni ricorrenti pattern nell'impiego dei foreign fighters in battaglia valutandone l'effettivo impatto dal punto di vista miliare.

AbstractSince the end of the bipolar era, the military activism of several Western powers has raised questions about parliamentary control, fostering growing research and analyses on the features, drivers and consequences of the different kinds of oversight exercised by legislative assemblies. Within this scholarly debate, this article focuses on the under-studied case of Italy. How did Italian parties vote on military operations abroad in the post-Cold War era? In order to answer this question, the article presents the first detailed and comprehensive set of data on parliamentary votes over the deployment of the Italian armed forces in the post-Cold War era (i.e. from the beginning of the 1990s to the recent operation against ISIL). Thanks to this extensive new empirical material, the article assesses selected arguments developed by the literature on political parties and foreign policy, paving the way for further research.