Ambivalent Attachments: The Hegemonic Politics of American Nationhood
In: New political science: official journal of the New Political Science Caucus with APSA, Band 28, Heft 2, S. 181-200
ISSN: 1469-9931
Nationhood has always been characterized by ambivalence in terms of the content & contours of who belongs & how. As countries throughout the world confront the vagaries of globalization, political leaders & the public are struggling to negotiate a sense of belonging that reconciles the reality of global interconnectedness with the rhetoric of national particularism. For the US, this challenge is intensified by the need to reconcile a long-standing rhetoric of civic nationhood with the persistent (albeit malleable) reality of ethno-cultural exclusion. Resulting contradictions are particularly evident in the post-9/11 policies & rhetoric of political leaders & ethnic groups. This article uses these discourses to analyze contemporary nation-shaping politics in the US. Ambivalence is pervasive on the part of government officials & marginalized ethnic groups, but in a manner that ultimately confirms rather than rejects or transcends the hegemony of nationhood as a form of belonging. Adapted from the source document.