Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
17 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The international library of essays in law and legal theory
In: Areas 16
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 59, Heft 4, S. 1170-1171
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: Texas international law journal, Band 42, Heft 3, S. 597-618
ISSN: 0163-7479
In: Harvard international law journal, Band 14, S. 345-367
ISSN: 0017-8063
In: Public administration: the journal of the Australian regional groups of the Royal Institute of Public Administration, Band 30, Heft 3, S. 229-247
ISSN: 1467-8500
Conflicts between the public duties and private interests of government officials have received considerable attention and have produced a variety of legislative and executive actions. President Carter laid down high standards of behavior for his appointees; Congress tightened its financial disclosure requirements in 1977 and the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 embodies some of these measures in legislation. Britain established a register of Parliamentarians' interests in 1975 and a Royal Commission has made a report on the standards of behavior in public life. An Australian Joint Parliamentary Committee recommended a register of Parliamentarians' interests in 1975, and now a Committee of Inquiry is determining whether principles for the resolution of conflicts between public duty and private interest can be developed for Ministers, Parliamentarians, public servants, and other public officials. This article outlines the existing law and practice involving conflicts of interest in the United States, Britain, and Australia, each of which exhibits a high level of economic and industrial advancement. United States developments are important because these far-reaching measures have been adopted by other governments. Because many countries have adopted the Westminster model of Parliamentary government, Britain's enviable record of high standards in public life demands examination. Australia ostensibly adopted the Westminster model with certain modifications which provide Australia with a federal system and a written constitution granting its High Court the power to review and invalidate legislation.
BASE
In: Stockholm Centre for Commercial Law 5