Suchergebnisse

Propomos nesse artigo o estudo analítico evolutivo da legislação sobre adoção de crianças, bem como apontamos o cenário atual da entrega de crianças no Brasil. Apresentamos uma reflexão da história do abandono de crianças desde os tempos coloniais, com a Roda dos Expostos, até a atual legislação vigente sobre adoção. O estudo constitui parte do corpo teórico de uma tese de doutorado que analisou o contexto da entrega voluntária de crianças para adoção, no qual procedemos a análise documental da legislação sobre a temática, cujo contexto brasileiro aqui relatamos. Levantamos na legislação com o auxílio da análise de conteúdo que com o passar dos anos de acordo com as necessidades sociais foram criados mecanismos legais que normatizaram a adoção e criminalizaram o abandono de crianças. A legislação sobre adoção foi se configurando e se modificando ao longo dos anos partindo desde o foco no interesse de continuidade e descendência de uma família sem filhos biológicos até a prioridade do melhor interesse da criança. Encontramos nos resultados avanços na legislação com a inclusão da perspectiva da mulher, a mãe biológica, como parte relevante no processo de entrega, atendida sem constrangimento e direito a atendimento social e psicológica. Consideramos que a Lei 13.509 de 2017 avança alguns passos não só na garantia de proteção à criança, mas também na garantia de autonomia da mulher em relação ao seu direito de escolha de ser ou não ser mãe. Concluímos que com a implantação da Lei nº 12.010, a entrega voluntária de crianças para adoção passou a ser legalizada e mediada pelos Juizados da Infância do país o que ampliou a discussão sobre a entrega voluntária para doação e, também, acerca da assistência à mulher que doa.

Resumo: Este artigo apresenta resultados da pesquisa que problematizou a noção de profissão 'feminina' presente na psicologia, conceituação que é assentada no quantitativo majoritário de mulheres no exercício dessa profissão. Buscamos compreender os sentidos que são associados aos(às) profissionais da psicologia e ao 'feminino' a partir da Teoria das Representações Sociais, objetivando, ainda, mapear os preconceitos que cercam essa profissão. Apresentaremos, aqui, um dos procedimentos metodológicos adotados na pesquisa, a roda de conversa, cujos(as) participantes foram estudantes do penúltimo ano do curso de Psicologia de uma universidade pública do estado de Pernambuco. Através da análise de enunciação, interpretamos que a profissão foi associada ao cuidado, típica função atribuída ao feminino, porém, isso também foi questionado pelos(as) participantes, que demonstraram criticidade na reflexão sobre o tema, o que expressa os tensionamentos e as perspectivas de mudanças envolvidas na formação inicial das novas gerações de psicólogos(as).

Context: Place-based transdisciplinary research involves multiple academic disciplines and non-academic actors. Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research (LTSER) platform is one concept with ~ 80 initiatives globally. Objectives: As an exercise in learning through evaluation we audited (1) the siting, construction and maintenance of individual LTSER platforms, and (2) them as a distributed infrastructure for place-based transdisciplinary research with focus on the European continent. Methods: First, we defined a normative model for ideal performance at both platform and network levels. Second, four surveys were sent out to the 67 self-reported LTSER platforms officially listed at the end of 2016. Third, with a focus on the network level, we analyzed the spatial distribution of both long-term ecological monitoring sites within LTSER platforms, and LTSER platforms across the European continent. Fourth, narrative biographies of 18 platforms in different stages of development were analyzed. Results: While the siting ofLTSER platforms represented biogeographical regions well, variations in land use history and democratic governance were not well represented. Platform construction was based on 2.1 ecological monitoring sites, with 72% ecosystem and 28% social system research. Maintenance of a platform required three to five staff members, focused mostly on ecosystem research, was based mainly on national funding, and had 1–2 years of future funding secured. Networking with other landscape approach concepts was common. Conclusions: Individually, and as a network, LTSER platforms have good potential for transdisciplinary knowledge production and learning about sustainability challenges. To improve the range of variation of Pan-European social–ecological systems we encourage interfacing with other landscape approach concepts. ; Peer reviewed

Context Place-based transdisciplinary research involves multiple academic disciplines and non-academic actors. Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research (LTSER) platform is one concept with similar to 80 initiatives globally.Objectives As an exercise in learning through evaluation we audited (1) the siting, construction and maintenance of individual LTSER platforms, and (2) them as a distributed infrastructure for place-based transdisciplinary research with focus on the European continent.MethodsFirst, we defined a normative model for ideal performance at both platform and network levels. Second, four surveys were sent out to the 67 self-reported LTSER platforms officially listed at the end of 2016. Third, with a focus on the network level, we analyzed the spatial distribution of both long-term ecological monitoring sites within LTSER platforms, and LTSER platforms across the European continent. Fourth, narrative biographies of 18 platforms in different stages of development were analyzed.ResultsWhile the siting of LTSER platforms represented biogeographical regions well, variations in land use history and democratic governance were not well represented. Platform construction was based on 2.1 ecological monitoring sites, with 72% ecosystem and 28% social system research. Maintenance of a platform required three to five staff members, focused mostly on ecosystem research, was based mainly on national funding, and had 1-2years of future funding secured. Networking with other landscape approach concepts was common.ConclusionsIndividually, and as a network, LTSER platforms have good potential for transdisciplinary knowledge production and learning about sustainability challenges. To improve the range of variation of Pan-European social-ecological systems we encourage interfacing with other landscape approach concepts. ; Peer reviewed

Context Place-based transdisciplinary research involves multiple academic disciplines and non-academic actors. Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research (LTSER) platform is one concept with similar to 80 initiatives globally.Objectives As an exercise in learning through evaluation we audited (1) the siting, construction and maintenance of individual LTSER platforms, and (2) them as a distributed infrastructure for place-based transdisciplinary research with focus on the European continent.MethodsFirst, we defined a normative model for ideal performance at both platform and network levels. Second, four surveys were sent out to the 67 self-reported LTSER platforms officially listed at the end of 2016. Third, with a focus on the network level, we analyzed the spatial distribution of both long-term ecological monitoring sites within LTSER platforms, and LTSER platforms across the European continent. Fourth, narrative biographies of 18 platforms in different stages of development were analyzed.ResultsWhile the siting of LTSER platforms represented biogeographical regions well, variations in land use history and democratic governance were not well represented. Platform construction was based on 2.1 ecological monitoring sites, with 72% ecosystem and 28% social system research. Maintenance of a platform required three to five staff members, focused mostly on ecosystem research, was based mainly on national funding, and had 1-2years of future funding secured. Networking with other landscape approach concepts was common.ConclusionsIndividually, and as a network, LTSER platforms have good potential for transdisciplinary knowledge production and learning about sustainability challenges. To improve the range of variation of Pan-European social-ecological systems we encourage interfacing with other landscape approach concepts.